PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ANAB vs. APH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ANAB vs. APH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AnaptysBio, Inc. (ANAB) and Amphenol Corporation (APH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ANAB achieves a 58.54% return, which is significantly higher than APH's 9.45% return.


ANAB

1D
-0.04%
1M
-26.57%
YTD
58.54%
6M
75.64%
1Y
226.79%
3Y*
60.13%
5Y*
27.51%
10Y*

APH

1D
-0.53%
1M
4.67%
YTD
9.45%
6M
6.89%
1Y
62.16%
3Y*
57.45%
5Y*
34.98%
10Y*
27.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ANAB vs. APH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ANAB
AnaptysBio, Inc.
58.54%266.16%-38.19%-30.88%-10.82%61.63%32.31%-74.53%-36.67%492.47%
APH
Amphenol Corporation
9.45%96.08%41.30%31.85%-11.96%35.25%22.09%34.91%-6.82%32.92%

Correlation

The correlation between ANAB and APH is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2017

0.22

The correlation between ANAB and APH shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (1 year) to 0.22 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ANAB:

$1.47B

APH:

$190.39B

EPS

ANAB:

-$0.91

APH:

$4.58

PS Ratio

ANAB:

6.50

APH:

7.31

PB Ratio

ANAB:

115.33

APH:

13.62

Total Revenue (TTM)

ANAB:

$232.39M

APH:

$25.90B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ANAB:

$245.59M

APH:

$9.67B

EBITDA (TTM)

ANAB:

$52.72M

APH:

$7.45B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ANAB vs. APH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ANAB
ANAB Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
ANAB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANAB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANAB Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
ANAB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANAB Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

APH
APH Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
APH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APH Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
APH Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
APH Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
APH Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ANAB vs. APH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AnaptysBio, Inc. (ANAB) and Amphenol Corporation (APH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ANABAPHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.28

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.11

2.22

+5.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.93

5.79

+15.14

ANAB vs. APH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ANAB Sharpe Ratio is 3.24, which is higher than the APH Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ANAB and APH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ANABAPHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.24

1.55

+1.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

1.16

-0.73

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.63

-0.40

Drawdowns

ANAB vs. APH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ANAB drawdown since its inception was -92.08%, which is greater than APH's maximum drawdown of -63.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANAB and APH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ANABAPHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.08%

-63.41%

-28.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.15%

-28.19%

+0.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-69.32%

-28.19%

-41.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-69.32%

-28.73%

-40.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-40.21%

-11.03%

-29.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-64.74%

-13.56%

-51.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.92%

10.76%

+0.16%

Volatility

ANAB vs. APH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AnaptysBio, Inc. (ANAB) is 11.47%, while Amphenol Corporation (APH) has a volatility of 15.91%. This indicates that ANAB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than APH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ANABAPHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.47%

15.91%

-4.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.57%

36.03%

+10.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

70.75%

40.39%

+30.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

65.34%

30.42%

+34.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

75.51%

27.75%

+47.76%

Dividends

ANAB vs. APH - Dividend Comparison

ANAB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while APH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ANAB
AnaptysBio, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
APH
Amphenol Corporation
0.56%0.55%0.79%1.07%1.06%0.89%0.80%0.89%1.09%0.80%0.86%1.01%

Financials

ANAB vs. APH - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AnaptysBio, Inc. and Amphenol Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B20222023202420252026
25.56M
7.62B
(ANAB) Total Revenue
(APH) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


ANAB and APH have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

APH has higher volatility (15.91%) compared to ANAB (11.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ANAB dropped -92.08% vs APH's -63.41%.

ANAB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.24 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ANAB and APH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer