AMZU vs. TMF

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

AMZU (Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares) and TMF (Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AMZU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Amazon.com, Inc. (150%), while TMF is a Leveraged Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, AMZU returned 16.84%/yr vs -21.07%/yr for TMF. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AMZU charges 1.06%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for TMF.

Performance

AMZU vs. TMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares (AMZU) and Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMZU achieves a -7.16% return, which is significantly lower than TMF's -4.67% return.

AMZU

• 1D: 0.53%
• 1M: -24.60%
• YTD: -7.16%
• 6M: -8.47%
• 1Y: 2.43%
• 3Y*: 16.84%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TMF

• 1D: -0.62%
• 1M: 4.96%
• YTD: -4.67%
• 6M: -5.95%
• 1Y: -2.80%
• 3Y*: -21.07%
• 5Y*: -31.33%
• 10Y*: -16.87%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMZU vs. TMF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
AMZU Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares	-7.16%	-11.59%	60.99%	118.70%	-49.82%
TMF Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF	-4.67%	-2.94%	-35.95%	-13.01%	-24.04%

Correlation

The correlation between AMZU and TMF is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.13
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2022	0.08

Return for Risk

AMZU vs. TMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMZU

AMZU Risk / Return Rank: 10
AMZU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
AMZU Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
AMZU Omega Ratio Rank: 12
AMZU Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
AMZU Martin Ratio Rank: 9

TMF

TMF Risk / Return Rank: 8
TMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
TMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
TMF Omega Ratio Rank: 8
TMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
TMF Martin Ratio Rank: 8

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMZU vs. TMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares (AMZU) and Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AMZU	TMF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.04	-0.10	+0.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.50	0.05	+0.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.01	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.06	-0.11	+0.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.12	-0.23	+0.35

AMZU vs. TMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMZU Sharpe Ratio is 0.04, which is higher than the TMF Sharpe Ratio of -0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMZU and TMF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AMZU vs. TMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMZU drawdown since its inception was -55.59%, smaller than the maximum TMF drawdown of -92.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZU and TMF.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMZU	TMF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.59%	-92.89%	+37.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-42.98%	-26.51%	-16.47%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-55.47%	-56.09%	+0.62%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-88.81%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-92.89%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-31.62%	-92.11%	+60.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.94%	-43.76%	+21.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	19.67%	12.26%	+7.41%

Volatility

AMZU vs. TMF - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares (AMZU) has a higher volatility of 20.46% compared to Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF) at 6.50%. This indicates that AMZU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AMZU	TMF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	20.46%	6.50%	+13.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	43.46%	19.35%	+24.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	61.59%	27.91%	+33.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	59.41%	46.59%	+12.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	59.41%	43.86%	+15.55%

AMZU vs. TMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMZU has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than TMF's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

AMZU vs. TMF - Dividend Comparison

AMZU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.54%, more than TMF's 4.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AMZU Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares	6.54%	6.12%	3.79%	3.37%	0.50%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TMF Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF	4.09%	4.06%	4.29%	2.82%	1.62%	0.13%	2.23%	0.94%	1.49%	0.41%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMZU and TMF in my portfolio?

AMZU and TMF have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AMZU or TMF?

AMZU has higher volatility (20.46%) compared to TMF (6.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMZU dropped -55.59% vs TMF's -92.89%.

Which ETF is better, AMZU or TMF?

On 3-year performance, AMZU leads with 16.84% vs -21.07% for TMF. On fees, TMF is cheaper at 1.01% per year. On volatility, TMF has been the lower-risk option at 6.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AMZU or TMF?

Over the 3-year period, AMZU has performed better with a 16.84% return vs -21.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AMZU or TMF?

TMF is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.06% for AMZU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AMZU or TMF?

AMZU has the higher dividend yield at 6.54%, compared with 4.09% for TMF.

What is the main difference between AMZU and TMF?

AMZU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while TMF is Leveraged Bonds. AMZU tracks Amazon.com, Inc. (150%), while TMF tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 1.06% for AMZU and 1.01% for TMF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AMZU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.04 vs -0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.