PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMZU vs. SCHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMZU vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares (AMZU) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMZU achieves a 31.87% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 7.11% return.


AMZU

1D
9.20%
1M
32.79%
6M
20.81%
YTD
31.87%
1Y
40.14%
3Y*
26.94%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
20.34%

SCHG

1D
2.02%
1M
2.17%
6M
8.95%
YTD
7.11%
1Y
18.50%
3Y*
23.37%
5Y*
13.47%
10Y*
18.33%
ALL TIME*
16.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$145.89M$124.32M$119.04M
$249.58M$250.01M$339.80M

AMZU vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
AMZU
Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares
31.87%-11.59%60.99%118.70%-49.82%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
7.11%17.50%34.95%50.10%-8.66%

Correlation

The correlation between AMZU and SCHG is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2022

0.73

The correlation between AMZU and SCHG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

AMZU vs. SCHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AMZU
SCHG

Consumer Cyclical

100.0%
11.2%

Basic Materials

-

1.6%

Communication Services

-

14.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

1.9%

Energy

-

0.9%

Financial Services

-

7.7%

Healthcare

-

9.9%

Industrials

-

7.6%

Real Estate

-

0.6%

Technology

-

44.0%

Utilities

-

0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

AMZU
100.0%
SCHG
11.2%

Basic Materials

AMZU

-

SCHG
1.6%

Communication Services

AMZU

-

SCHG
14.1%

Consumer Defensive

AMZU

-

SCHG
1.9%

Energy

AMZU

-

SCHG
0.9%

Financial Services

AMZU

-

SCHG
7.7%

Healthcare

AMZU

-

SCHG
9.9%

Industrials

AMZU

-

SCHG
7.6%

Real Estate

AMZU

-

SCHG
0.6%

Technology

AMZU

-

SCHG
44.0%

Utilities

AMZU

-

SCHG
0.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMZU vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AMZU
AMZU Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
AMZU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMZU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMZU Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
AMZU Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMZU Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHG
SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AMZU vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares (AMZU) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AMZUSCHGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.20

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.94

1.13

-0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.90

3.58

-1.68

AMZU vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMZU Sharpe Ratio is 0.59, which is lower than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMZU and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AMZU vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMZU drawdown since its inception was -55.59%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZU and SCHG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMZUSCHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.59%

-34.59%

-21.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.98%

-16.41%

-26.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-55.47%

-23.39%

-32.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.87%

-1.15%

-1.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.07%

-5.19%

-16.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.22%

5.19%

+16.03%

Volatility

AMZU vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares (AMZU) has a higher volatility of 32.05% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 4.76%. This indicates that AMZU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMZUSCHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

32.05%

4.76%

+27.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

52.68%

13.02%

+39.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

68.66%

16.66%

+52.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

61.44%

22.45%

+38.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

61.44%

21.60%

+39.84%

AMZU vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMZU has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

AMZU vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

AMZU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.42%, more than SCHG's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMZU
Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares
4.42%6.12%3.79%3.37%0.50%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.38%0.36%0.39%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMZU and SCHG have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMZU has higher volatility (32.05%) compared to SCHG (4.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMZU dropped -55.59% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

On 3-year performance, AMZU leads with 26.94% vs 23.37% for SCHG. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SCHG has been the lower-risk option at 4.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, AMZU has performed better with a 26.94% return vs 23.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AMZU.

AMZU has the higher dividend yield at 4.42%, compared with 0.38% for SCHG.

AMZU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. AMZU tracks Amazon.com, Inc. (200%), while SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for AMZU and 0.04% for SCHG.

SCHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.12 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMZU and SCHG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer