AMZU vs. FNGU

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

AMZU (Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares) and FNGU (MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs) are both Leveraged Equities funds - AMZU tracks the Amazon.com, Inc. (200%) while FNGU tracks the NYSE FANG+ Index (Gross Total Return) (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, AMZU returned 28.33% vs 13.50% for FNGU. Their 0.71 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. AMZU charges 0.99%/yr vs 2.60%/yr for FNGU.

Performance

AMZU vs. FNGU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares (AMZU) and MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs (FNGU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMZU achieves a 20.75% return, which is significantly higher than FNGU's 5.54% return.

AMZU

• 1D: 29.73%
• 1M: 21.60%
• 6M: 14.03%
• YTD: 20.75%
• 1Y: 28.33%
• 3Y*: 26.76%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 17.69%

FNGU

• 1D: 5.13%
• 1M: 0.64%
• 6M: 18.28%
• YTD: 5.54%
• 1Y: 13.50%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 5.98%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AMZU Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares	$124.23M	$117.55M	$117.81M
FNGU MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs	$92.08M	$119.18M	$153.90M

AMZU vs. FNGU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AMZU Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares	20.75%	-15.31%
FNGU MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs	5.54%	3.02%

Correlation

The correlation between AMZU and FNGU is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025	0.71

The correlation between AMZU and FNGU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

AMZU vs. FNGU - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AMZU	FNGU
Consumer Cyclical	100.0%	9.6%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	29.8%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	60.6%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

AMZU vs. FNGU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AMZU

AMZU Risk / Return Rank: 16
AMZU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
AMZU Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
AMZU Omega Ratio Rank: 20
AMZU Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
AMZU Martin Ratio Rank: 13

FNGU

FNGU Risk / Return Rank: 14
FNGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
FNGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
FNGU Omega Ratio Rank: 17
FNGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
FNGU Martin Ratio Rank: 12

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AMZU vs. FNGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares (AMZU) and MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs (FNGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AMZU	FNGU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.10	0.07	+0.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.69	0.56	+0.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.07	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.17	0.07	+0.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.33	0.16	+0.17

AMZU vs. FNGU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMZU Sharpe Ratio is 0.10, which is higher than the FNGU Sharpe Ratio of 0.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMZU and FNGU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AMZU vs. FNGU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMZU drawdown since its inception was -55.59%, smaller than the maximum FNGU drawdown of -61.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZU and FNGU.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMZU	FNGU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.59%	-61.30%	+5.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-42.98%	-59.55%	+16.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-55.47%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.06%	-26.25%	+15.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.09%	-22.61%	+0.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	21.42%	26.68%	-5.26%

Volatility

AMZU vs. FNGU - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares (AMZU) has a higher volatility of 31.08% compared to MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs (FNGU) at 17.87%. This indicates that AMZU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNGU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AMZU	FNGU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	31.08%	17.87%	+13.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	52.00%	53.81%	-1.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	70.05%	65.86%	+4.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	61.30%	79.67%	-18.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	61.30%	79.67%	-18.37%

AMZU vs. FNGU - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMZU has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than FNGU's 2.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

AMZU vs. FNGU - Dividend Comparison

AMZU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.83%, while FNGU has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
AMZU Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares	4.83%	6.12%	3.79%	3.37%	0.50%
FNGU MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMZU and FNGU in my portfolio?

AMZU and FNGU have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AMZU or FNGU?

AMZU has higher volatility (31.08%) compared to FNGU (17.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMZU dropped -55.59% vs FNGU's -61.30%.

Which ETF is better, AMZU or FNGU?

On 1-year performance, AMZU leads with 28.33% vs 13.50% for FNGU. On fees, AMZU is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, FNGU has been the lower-risk option at 17.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AMZU or FNGU?

Over the 1-year period, AMZU has performed better with a 28.33% return vs 13.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AMZU or FNGU?

AMZU is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 2.60% for FNGU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AMZU or FNGU?

AMZU has the higher dividend yield at 4.83%, compared with 0.00% for FNGU.

What is the main difference between AMZU and FNGU?

AMZU tracks Amazon.com, Inc. (200%), while FNGU tracks NYSE FANG+ Index (Gross Total Return) (300%). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for AMZU and 2.60% for FNGU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AMZU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.10 vs 0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.