AMZU vs. FNGU

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AMZU (Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares) and FNGU (MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN) are both Leveraged Equities funds - AMZU tracks the Amazon.com, Inc. (150%) while FNGU tracks the NYSE FANG (TR) (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, AMZU returned 21.37% vs 64.67% for FNGU. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AMZU charges 1.06%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for FNGU.

Performance

AMZU vs. FNGU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares (AMZU) and MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMZU achieves a 8.04% return, which is significantly lower than FNGU's 36.18% return.

AMZU

• 1D: -5.04%
• 1M: -16.62%
• YTD: 8.04%
• 6M: 5.52%
• 1Y: 21.37%
• 3Y*: 25.11%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FNGU

• 1D: -3.75%
• 1M: 33.96%
• YTD: 36.18%
• 6M: 16.22%
• 1Y: 64.67%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMZU vs. FNGU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AMZU Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares	8.04%	-12.34%
FNGU MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN	36.18%	4.24%

Correlation

The correlation between AMZU and FNGU is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2025	0.71

The correlation between AMZU and FNGU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

AMZU vs. FNGU - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AMZU	FNGU
Consumer Cyclical	100.0%	9.6%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	29.8%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	60.6%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

AMZU vs. FNGU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMZU

AMZU Risk / Return Rank: 15
AMZU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
AMZU Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
AMZU Omega Ratio Rank: 17
AMZU Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
AMZU Martin Ratio Rank: 14

FNGU

FNGU Risk / Return Rank: 27
FNGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
FNGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
FNGU Omega Ratio Rank: 30
FNGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
FNGU Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMZU vs. FNGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares (AMZU) and MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AMZU	FNGU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.36	1.13	-0.77
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.91	1.69	-0.78
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.21	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.50	1.09	-0.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.13	2.64	-1.51
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AMZU vs. FNGU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMZU Sharpe Ratio is 0.36, which is lower than the FNGU Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMZU and FNGU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AMZU	FNGU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.36	1.13	-0.77
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.25	0.40	-0.15

Drawdowns

AMZU vs. FNGU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMZU drawdown since its inception was -55.59%, smaller than the maximum FNGU drawdown of -60.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZU and FNGU.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMZU	FNGU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.59%	-60.84%	+5.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-42.98%	-59.55%	+16.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-55.47%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-20.42%	-4.84%	-15.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.91%	-22.06%	+0.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	18.91%	24.57%	-5.66%

Volatility

AMZU vs. FNGU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares (AMZU) is 14.41%, while MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU) has a volatility of 16.40%. This indicates that AMZU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNGU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AMZU	FNGU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.41%	16.40%	-1.99%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	40.64%	44.77%	-4.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	59.79%	57.50%	+2.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	59.16%	78.60%	-19.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	59.16%	78.60%	-19.44%

AMZU vs. FNGU - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMZU has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than FNGU's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

AMZU vs. FNGU - Dividend Comparison

AMZU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.62%, while FNGU has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
AMZU Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares	5.62%	6.12%	3.79%	3.37%	0.50%
FNGU MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMZU and FNGU in my portfolio?

AMZU and FNGU have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AMZU or FNGU?

FNGU has higher volatility (16.40%) compared to AMZU (14.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMZU dropped -55.59% vs FNGU's -60.84%.

Which ETF is better, AMZU or FNGU?

On 1-year performance, FNGU leads with 64.67% vs 21.37% for AMZU. On fees, FNGU is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, AMZU has been the lower-risk option at 14.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AMZU or FNGU?

Over the 1-year period, FNGU has performed better with a 64.67% return vs 21.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AMZU or FNGU?

FNGU is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.06% for AMZU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AMZU or FNGU?

AMZU has the higher dividend yield at 5.62%, compared with 0.00% for FNGU.

What is the main difference between AMZU and FNGU?

AMZU tracks Amazon.com, Inc. (150%), while FNGU tracks NYSE FANG (TR) (300%). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Bank of Montreal. Their fees differ too: 1.06% for AMZU and 0.95% for FNGU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FNGU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.13 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.