AMZU vs. VGT
AMZU (Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares) and VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AMZU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Amazon.com, Inc. (150%), while VGT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, AMZU returned 25.11%/yr vs 33.48%/yr for VGT. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AMZU charges 1.06%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VGT.
Performance
AMZU vs. VGT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMZU achieves a 8.04% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 31.64% return.
AMZU
- 1D
- -5.04%
- 1M
- -16.62%
- YTD
- 8.04%
- 6M
- 5.52%
- 1Y
- 21.37%
- 3Y*
- 25.11%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VGT
- 1D
- -1.48%
- 1M
- 18.07%
- YTD
- 31.64%
- 6M
- 30.51%
- 1Y
- 60.15%
- 3Y*
- 33.48%
- 5Y*
- 22.23%
- 10Y*
- 25.78%
AMZU vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMZU Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares | 8.04% | -11.59% | 60.99% | 118.70% | -50.17% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 31.64% | 21.77% | 29.30% | 52.66% | -6.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMZU and VGT is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2022 | 0.64 |
The correlation between AMZU and VGT shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.64 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
AMZU vs. VGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AMZU
VGT
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
AMZU
VGT
Basic Materials
AMZU
-
VGT
Communication Services
AMZU
-
VGT
Consumer Defensive
AMZU
-
VGT
-
Energy
AMZU
-
VGT
Financial Services
AMZU
-
VGT
Healthcare
AMZU
-
VGT
Industrials
AMZU
-
VGT
Real Estate
AMZU
-
VGT
-
Technology
AMZU
-
VGT
Utilities
AMZU
-
VGT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMZU vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank
AMZU
VGT
AMZU vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares (AMZU) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AMZU | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.47 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.50 | 3.69 | -3.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.13 | 11.77 | -10.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMZU | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 | 2.95 | -2.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.89 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.05 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.68 | -0.43 |
Drawdowns
AMZU vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMZU drawdown since its inception was -55.59%, roughly equal to the maximum VGT drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZU and VGT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMZU | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.59% | -54.63% | -0.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.98% | -16.40% | -26.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -55.47% | -27.23% | -28.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.42% | -1.48% | -18.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.91% | -7.95% | -13.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.91% | 5.13% | +13.78% |
Volatility
AMZU vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares (AMZU) has a higher volatility of 14.41% compared to Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) at 6.39%. This indicates that AMZU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMZU | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.41% | 6.39% | +8.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.64% | 16.07% | +24.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 59.79% | 20.57% | +39.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 59.16% | 25.18% | +33.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 59.16% | 24.60% | +34.56% |
AMZU vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMZU has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMZU vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison
AMZU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.62%, more than VGT's 0.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMZU Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares | 5.62% | 6.12% | 3.79% | 3.37% | 0.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 0.31% | 0.40% | 0.60% | 0.65% | 0.91% | 0.64% | 0.82% | 1.11% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.31% | 1.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMZU and VGT have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMZU has higher volatility (14.41%) compared to VGT (6.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMZU dropped -55.59% vs VGT's -54.63%.
On 3-year performance, VGT leads with 33.48% vs 25.11% for AMZU. On fees, VGT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, VGT has been the lower-risk option at 6.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, VGT has performed better with a 33.48% return vs 25.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VGT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 1.06% for AMZU.
AMZU has the higher dividend yield at 5.62%, compared with 0.31% for VGT.
AMZU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while VGT is Technology Equities. AMZU tracks Amazon.com, Inc. (150%), while VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 1.06% for AMZU and 0.09% for VGT.
VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AMZU and VGT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer