AMZN vs. CLS
AMZN (Amazon.com, Inc) and CLS (Celestica Inc.) are both stocks. AMZN operates in Internet Retail (Consumer Cyclical), while CLS operates in Electronic Components (Technology). Over the past 10 years, AMZN returned 20.83%/yr vs 43.71%/yr for CLS. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AMZN vs. CLS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMZN achieves a 3.35% return, which is significantly lower than CLS's 32.99% return. Over the past 10 years, AMZN has underperformed CLS with an annualized return of 20.83%, while CLS has yielded a comparatively higher 43.71% annualized return.
AMZN
- 1D
- -1.23%
- 1M
- -11.69%
- YTD
- 3.35%
- 6M
- 5.46%
- 1Y
- 11.87%
- 3Y*
- 23.49%
- 5Y*
- 7.35%
- 10Y*
- 20.83%
CLS
- 1D
- 1.88%
- 1M
- 5.52%
- YTD
- 32.99%
- 6M
- 28.26%
- 1Y
- 200.71%
- 3Y*
- 207.28%
- 5Y*
- 116.26%
- 10Y*
- 43.71%
AMZN vs. CLS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMZN Amazon.com, Inc | 3.35% | 5.21% | 44.39% | 80.88% | -49.62% | 2.38% | 76.26% | 23.03% | 28.43% | 55.96% |
CLS Celestica Inc. | 32.99% | 220.27% | 215.23% | 159.80% | 1.26% | 37.92% | -2.42% | -5.70% | -16.32% | -11.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMZN and CLS is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 1998 | 0.32 |
The correlation between AMZN and CLS shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (1 year) to 0.39 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
AMZN:
$2.59T
CLS:
$45.48B
AMZN:
$8.37
CLS:
$8.28
AMZN:
28.50
CLS:
47.45
AMZN:
0.69
CLS:
0.64
AMZN:
3.48
CLS:
3.30
AMZN:
5.87
CLS:
21.68
AMZN:
$742.78B
CLS:
$13.81B
AMZN:
$348.59B
CLS:
$1.60B
AMZN:
$152.71B
CLS:
$1.32B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMZN vs. CLS — Risk / Return Rank
AMZN
CLS
AMZN vs. CLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN) and Celestica Inc. (CLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AMZN | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.37 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.55 | 6.91 | -6.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.29 | 16.83 | -15.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AMZN vs. CLS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMZN drawdown since its inception was -94.40%, roughly equal to the maximum CLS drawdown of -96.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZN and CLS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMZN | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.40% | -96.93% | +2.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.74% | -29.24% | +7.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.88% | -53.96% | +23.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.15% | -53.96% | -2.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.15% | -80.60% | +24.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.25% | -16.78% | +3.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.19% | -73.31% | +45.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.21% | 11.98% | -2.77% |
Volatility
AMZN vs. CLS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN) is 7.92%, while Celestica Inc. (CLS) has a volatility of 27.54%. This indicates that AMZN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMZN | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.92% | 27.54% | -19.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.73% | 55.42% | -34.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.13% | 72.65% | -42.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.53% | 57.70% | -22.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.48% | 49.97% | -17.49% |
Dividends
AMZN vs. CLS - Dividend Comparison
Neither AMZN nor CLS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
AMZN vs. CLS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Amazon.com, Inc and Celestica Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AMZN vs. CLS - Profitability Comparison
AMZN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amazon.com, Inc reported a gross profit of 66.77B and revenue of 181.52B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.
CLS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a gross profit of 437.20M and revenue of 4.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.8%.
AMZN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amazon.com, Inc reported an operating income of 23.85B and revenue of 181.52B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.1%.
CLS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported an operating income of 272.10M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.7%.
AMZN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amazon.com, Inc reported a net income of 30.26B and revenue of 181.52B, resulting in a net margin of 16.7%.
CLS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a net income of 212.30M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in a net margin of 5.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AMZN and CLS have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CLS has higher volatility (27.54%) compared to AMZN (7.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMZN dropped -94.40% vs CLS's -96.93%.
CLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.78 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AMZN and CLS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer