AMZN.NEO vs. DRS

Last updated Jun 16, 2026

AMZN.NEO (Amazon.com CDR) and DRS (Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock) are both stocks. AMZN.NEO operates in Internet Retail (Consumer Cyclical), while DRS operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials). Over the past 3 years, AMZN.NEO returned 22.80%/yr vs 43.44%/yr for DRS. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

AMZN.NEO vs. DRS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Amazon.com CDR (AMZN.NEO) and Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock (DRS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

AMZN.NEO is traded in CAD, while DRS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the DRS values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMZN.NEO achieves a 5.45% return, which is significantly lower than DRS's 40.18% return.

AMZN.NEO

• 1D: 3.14%
• 1M: -7.04%
• YTD: 5.45%
• 6M: 8.99%
• 1Y: 13.14%
• 3Y*: 22.80%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DRS

• 1D: -3.87%
• 1M: 14.69%
• YTD: 40.18%
• 6M: 41.13%
• 1Y: 4.98%
• 3Y*: 43.44%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMZN.NEO vs. DRS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
AMZN.NEO Amazon.com CDR	5.45%	2.68%	41.82%	78.72%	-10.99%
DRS Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock	40.18%	1.70%	74.88%	53.08%	11.16%

Correlation

The correlation between AMZN.NEO and DRS is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.15
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.21
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 29, 2022	0.21

Fundamentals

EPS AMZN.NEO : $7.17 DRS : $1.44
PE Ratio AMZN.NEO : 2.82 DRS : 32.45
PS Ratio AMZN.NEO : 0.31 DRS : 2.55
Total Revenue (TTM) AMZN.NEO : $691.33B DRS : $3.70B
Gross Profit (TTM) AMZN.NEO : $345.98B DRS : $894.00M

Return for Risk

AMZN.NEO vs. DRS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMZN.NEO

AMZN.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 54
AMZN.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
AMZN.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
AMZN.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 50
AMZN.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
AMZN.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 57

DRS

DRS Risk / Return Rank: 42
DRS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
DRS Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
DRS Omega Ratio Rank: 40
DRS Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
DRS Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMZN.NEO vs. DRS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amazon.com CDR (AMZN.NEO) and Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock (DRS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AMZN.NEO	DRS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.44	0.12	+0.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.83	0.48	+0.34
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.06	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.60	0.16	+0.44
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.38	0.32	+1.05

AMZN.NEO vs. DRS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMZN.NEO Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is higher than the DRS Sharpe Ratio of 0.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMZN.NEO and DRS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AMZN.NEO vs. DRS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMZN.NEO drawdown since its inception was -56.92%, which is greater than DRS's maximum drawdown of -32.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZN.NEO and DRS.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMZN.NEO	DRS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.92%	-32.04%	-24.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.03%	-32.04%	+10.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-31.29%	-32.04%	+0.75%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.08%	-5.94%	-5.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.74%	-7.11%	-12.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.56%	15.39%	-5.83%

Volatility

AMZN.NEO vs. DRS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amazon.com CDR (AMZN.NEO) is 8.58%, while Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock (DRS) has a volatility of 14.45%. This indicates that AMZN.NEO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DRS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AMZN.NEO	DRS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.58%	14.45%	-5.87%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.60%	32.74%	-12.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.83%	41.38%	-11.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	35.55%	39.01%	-3.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	35.55%	39.01%	-3.46%

Dividends

AMZN.NEO vs. DRS - Dividend Comparison

AMZN.NEO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%.

Position	TTM	2025
AMZN.NEO Amazon.com CDR	0.00%	0.00%
DRS Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock	0.77%	1.06%

Financials

AMZN.NEO vs. DRS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Amazon.com CDR and Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

AMZN.NEO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amazon.com CDR reported a gross profit of 91.50B and revenue of 180.17B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.8%.

DRS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock reported a gross profit of 212.00M and revenue of 846.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.1%.

AMZN.NEO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amazon.com CDR reported an operating income of 17.42B and revenue of 180.17B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.7%.

DRS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock reported an operating income of 77.00M and revenue of 846.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.1%.

AMZN.NEO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amazon.com CDR reported a net income of 21.19B and revenue of 180.17B, resulting in a net margin of 11.8%.

DRS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock reported a net income of 62.00M and revenue of 846.00M, resulting in a net margin of 7.3%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMZN.NEO and DRS in my portfolio?

AMZN.NEO and DRS have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.