PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMZN.NEO vs. SMH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMZN.NEO vs. SMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Amazon.com CDR (AMZN.NEO) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

AMZN.NEO is traded in CAD, while SMH is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SMH values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMZN.NEO achieves a 8.88% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 79.39% return.


AMZN.NEO

1D
1.46%
1M
-7.24%
YTD
8.88%
6M
9.49%
1Y
19.48%
3Y*
24.13%
5Y*
10Y*

SMH

1D
0.00%
1M
24.53%
YTD
79.39%
6M
76.18%
1Y
158.23%
3Y*
66.68%
5Y*
43.19%
10Y*
38.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMZN.NEO vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
AMZN.NEO
Amazon.com CDR
8.88%2.80%41.82%78.72%-50.79%-8.37%
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
76.65%42.33%51.05%69.56%-28.80%23.35%

Correlation

The correlation between AMZN.NEO and SMH is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2021

0.55

The correlation between AMZN.NEO and SMH shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (1 year) to 0.55 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMZN.NEO vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMZN.NEO
AMZN.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
AMZN.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMZN.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMZN.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
AMZN.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMZN.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

SMH
SMH Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
SMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMH Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
SMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMH Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMZN.NEO vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amazon.com CDR (AMZN.NEO) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMZN.NEOSMHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.73

-0.60

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.89

11.90

-11.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.09

43.03

-40.94

AMZN.NEO vs. SMH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMZN.NEO Sharpe Ratio is 0.65, which is lower than the SMH Sharpe Ratio of 5.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMZN.NEO and SMH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMZN.NEOSMHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

5.25

-4.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

1.15

-1.00

Drawdowns

AMZN.NEO vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMZN.NEO drawdown since its inception was -56.75%, which is greater than SMH's maximum drawdown of -40.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZN.NEO and SMH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMZN.NEOSMHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.75%

-40.60%

-16.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.10%

-13.38%

-8.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.29%

-33.18%

+1.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.74%

0.00%

-7.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.53%

-6.69%

-12.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.34%

3.69%

+5.65%

Volatility

AMZN.NEO vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amazon.com CDR (AMZN.NEO) is 7.59%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 11.38%. This indicates that AMZN.NEO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMZN.NEOSMHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.59%

11.38%

-3.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.95%

24.03%

-3.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.16%

30.30%

-0.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.66%

33.44%

+2.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.66%

31.06%

+4.60%

Dividends

AMZN.NEO vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison

AMZN.NEO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMZN.NEO
Amazon.com CDR
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
0.18%0.31%0.44%0.60%1.18%0.51%0.69%1.50%1.88%1.43%0.80%2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMZN.NEO and SMH have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMZN.NEO and SMH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer