PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMZN.NEO vs. GOOGL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AMZN.NEO vs. GOOGL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Amazon.com CDR (AMZN.NEO) and Alphabet Inc. Class A (GOOGL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

AMZN.NEO is traded in CAD, while GOOGL is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GOOGL values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMZN.NEO achieves a 8.88% return, which is significantly lower than GOOGL's 20.63% return.


AMZN.NEO

1D
1.46%
1M
-7.24%
YTD
8.88%
6M
9.49%
1Y
19.48%
3Y*
24.13%
5Y*
10Y*

GOOGL

1D
3.78%
1M
-2.13%
YTD
20.63%
6M
16.94%
1Y
126.02%
3Y*
45.51%
5Y*
29.30%
10Y*
27.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMZN.NEO vs. GOOGL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
AMZN.NEO
Amazon.com CDR
8.88%2.80%41.82%78.72%-50.79%-8.37%
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc. Class A
20.63%58.38%47.69%54.84%-34.75%10.17%

Correlation

The correlation between AMZN.NEO and GOOGL is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2021

0.59

The correlation between AMZN.NEO and GOOGL shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.59 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AMZN.NEO:

CA$311.95B

GOOGL:

$4.55T

EPS

AMZN.NEO:

CA$7.17

GOOGL:

$13.11

PE Ratio

AMZN.NEO:

4.07

GOOGL:

28.38

PS Ratio

AMZN.NEO:

0.45

GOOGL:

10.76

PB Ratio

AMZN.NEO:

0.84

GOOGL:

9.51

Total Revenue (TTM)

AMZN.NEO:

CA$691.33B

GOOGL:

$422.57B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AMZN.NEO:

CA$345.98B

GOOGL:

$255.12B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMZN.NEO vs. GOOGL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMZN.NEO
AMZN.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
AMZN.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMZN.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMZN.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
AMZN.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMZN.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

GOOGL
GOOGL Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
GOOGL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOOGL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOOGL Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
GOOGL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOOGL Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMZN.NEO vs. GOOGL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amazon.com CDR (AMZN.NEO) and Alphabet Inc. Class A (GOOGL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMZN.NEOGOOGLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.70

-0.56

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.89

6.69

-5.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.09

22.98

-20.89

AMZN.NEO vs. GOOGL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMZN.NEO Sharpe Ratio is 0.65, which is lower than the GOOGL Sharpe Ratio of 4.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMZN.NEO and GOOGL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMZN.NEOGOOGLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

4.39

-3.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

0.96

-0.81

Drawdowns

AMZN.NEO vs. GOOGL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMZN.NEO drawdown since its inception was -56.75%, which is greater than GOOGL's maximum drawdown of -39.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZN.NEO and GOOGL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMZN.NEOGOOGLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.75%

-39.35%

-17.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.10%

-18.96%

-3.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.29%

-30.95%

-0.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.74%

-6.19%

-1.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.53%

-8.70%

-10.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.34%

5.50%

+3.84%

Volatility

AMZN.NEO vs. GOOGL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amazon.com CDR (AMZN.NEO) is 7.59%, while Alphabet Inc. Class A (GOOGL) has a volatility of 9.03%. This indicates that AMZN.NEO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GOOGL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMZN.NEOGOOGLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.59%

9.03%

-1.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.95%

20.20%

+0.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.16%

28.89%

+1.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.66%

30.06%

+5.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.66%

27.92%

+7.74%

Dividends

AMZN.NEO vs. GOOGL - Dividend Comparison

AMZN.NEO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GOOGL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%.


PositionTTM20252024
AMZN.NEO
Amazon.com CDR
0.00%0.00%0.00%
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc. Class A
0.23%0.27%0.32%

Financials

AMZN.NEO vs. GOOGL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Amazon.com CDR and Alphabet Inc. Class A. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


60.00B80.00B100.00B120.00B140.00B160.00B180.00B20222023202420252026
180.17B
109.90B
(AMZN.NEO) Total Revenue
(GOOGL) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. AMZN.NEO values in CAD, GOOGL values in USD

AMZN.NEO vs. GOOGL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Amazon.com CDR and Alphabet Inc. Class A over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
50.8%
62.5%
Portfolio components
AMZN.NEO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amazon.com CDR reported a gross profit of 91.50B and revenue of 180.17B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.8%.

GOOGL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alphabet Inc. Class A reported a gross profit of 68.63B and revenue of 109.90B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 62.5%.

AMZN.NEO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amazon.com CDR reported an operating income of 17.42B and revenue of 180.17B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.7%.

GOOGL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alphabet Inc. Class A reported an operating income of 39.70B and revenue of 109.90B, resulting in an operating margin of 36.1%.

AMZN.NEO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amazon.com CDR reported a net income of 21.19B and revenue of 180.17B, resulting in a net margin of 11.8%.

GOOGL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alphabet Inc. Class A reported a net income of 62.58B and revenue of 109.90B, resulting in a net margin of 56.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AMZN.NEO and GOOGL have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMZN.NEO and GOOGL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer