AMT vs. VGT
AMT (American Tower Corporation) is a stock, while VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) is Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. Over the past 10 years, AMT returned 7.89%/yr vs 25.49%/yr for VGT. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AMT vs. VGT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMT achieves a 4.18% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 23.32% return. Over the past 10 years, AMT has underperformed VGT with an annualized return of 7.89%, while VGT has yielded a comparatively higher 25.49% annualized return.
AMT
- 1D
- 1.67%
- 1M
- -1.50%
- YTD
- 4.18%
- 6M
- 5.83%
- 1Y
- -15.94%
- 3Y*
- 2.32%
- 5Y*
- -4.51%
- 10Y*
- 7.89%
VGT
- 1D
- -3.68%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 23.32%
- 6M
- 21.50%
- 1Y
- 46.82%
- 3Y*
- 30.13%
- 5Y*
- 19.51%
- 10Y*
- 25.49%
AMT vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMT American Tower Corporation | 4.18% | -0.92% | -12.16% | 5.37% | -25.67% | 32.89% | -0.48% | 47.87% | 13.32% | 37.71% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 23.32% | 21.77% | 29.30% | 52.66% | -29.70% | 30.45% | 46.04% | 48.62% | 2.46% | 37.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMT and VGT is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004 | 0.39 |
The correlation between AMT and VGT shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to 0.39 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMT vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank
AMT
VGT
AMT vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Tower Corporation (AMT) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AMT | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.35 | -0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.60 | 2.87 | -3.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.86 | 8.76 | -9.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AMT vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMT drawdown since its inception was -98.70%, which is greater than VGT's maximum drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMT and VGT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMT | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.70% | -54.63% | -44.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.67% | -16.40% | -10.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.54% | -27.23% | -0.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.34% | -35.07% | -10.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.34% | -35.07% | -10.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.93% | -7.71% | -23.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.02% | -7.95% | -19.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.64% | 5.36% | +13.28% |
Volatility
AMT vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for American Tower Corporation (AMT) is 8.61%, while Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a volatility of 11.39%. This indicates that AMT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMT | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.61% | 11.39% | -2.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.60% | 18.58% | +1.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.44% | 22.72% | +1.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.44% | 25.55% | +0.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.22% | 24.77% | +1.45% |
Dividends
AMT vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison
AMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.89%, more than VGT's 0.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMT American Tower Corporation | 3.89% | 3.87% | 3.53% | 2.99% | 2.77% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 1.64% | 1.99% | 1.84% | 2.05% | 1.87% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 0.33% | 0.40% | 0.60% | 0.65% | 0.91% | 0.64% | 0.82% | 1.11% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.31% | 1.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMT and VGT have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VGT has higher volatility (11.39%) compared to AMT (8.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMT dropped -98.70% vs VGT's -54.63%.
VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AMT and VGT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer