AMT vs. NVS

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about American Tower Corporation (AMT) and Novartis AG (NVS).

Performance

AMT vs. NVS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Tower Corporation (AMT) and Novartis AG (NVS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

AMT vs. NVS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AMT American Tower Corporation	-1.70%	-0.92%	-12.16%	5.37%	-25.67%	32.89%	-0.48%	47.87%	13.32%	37.71%
NVS Novartis AG	14.16%	46.95%	0.02%	16.14%	8.06%	-3.65%	3.34%	13.92%	5.95%	19.42%

Fundamentals

Market Cap AMT : $80.96B NVS : $294.65B
EPS AMT : $5.40 NVS : $7.20
PE Ratio AMT : 31.99 NVS : 21.22
PEG Ratio AMT : 9.12 NVS : 1.43
PS Ratio AMT : 7.60 NVS : 5.29
PB Ratio AMT : 22.17 NVS : 6.39
Total Revenue (TTM) AMT : $10.65B NVS : $56.15B
Gross Profit (TTM) AMT : $7.84B NVS : $41.12B
EBITDA (TTM) AMT : $6.41B NVS : $22.99B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMT achieves a -1.70% return, which is significantly lower than NVS's 14.16% return. Over the past 10 years, AMT has underperformed NVS with an annualized return of 7.75%, while NVS has yielded a comparatively higher 11.92% annualized return.

AMT

• 1D: 1.30%
• 1M: -10.05%
• YTD: -1.70%
• 6M: -9.39%
• 1Y: -17.91%
• 3Y*: -2.23%
• 5Y*: -3.60%
• 10Y*: 7.75%

NVS

• 1D: 1.59%
• 1M: -6.65%
• YTD: 14.16%
• 6M: 22.74%
• 1Y: 41.19%
• 3Y*: 22.57%
• 5Y*: 16.43%
• 10Y*: 11.92%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

AMT vs. NVS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMT

AMT Risk / Return Rank: 17
AMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
AMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
AMT Omega Ratio Rank: 14
AMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
AMT Martin Ratio Rank: 23

NVS

NVS Risk / Return Rank: 89
NVS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
NVS Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
NVS Omega Ratio Rank: 85
NVS Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
NVS Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMT vs. NVS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Tower Corporation (AMT) and Novartis AG (NVS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AMT	NVS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.72	1.91	-2.63
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.88	2.51	-3.39
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.89	1.33	-0.44
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.64	3.70	-4.34
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.06	10.89	-11.94
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AMT vs. NVS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMT Sharpe Ratio is -0.72, which is lower than the NVS Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMT and NVS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AMT	NVS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.72	1.91	-2.63
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.14	0.89	-1.03
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.30	0.61	-0.31
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.20	0.43	-0.23

Correlation

The correlation between AMT and NVS is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

AMT vs. NVS - Dividend Comparison

AMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.94%, more than NVS's 3.12% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AMT American Tower Corporation	3.94%	3.87%	3.53%	2.99%	2.77%	1.78%	2.02%	1.64%	1.99%	1.84%	2.05%	1.87%
NVS Novartis AG	3.12%	2.90%	3.84%	3.44%	3.70%	3.86%	3.22%	3.03%	3.47%	3.24%	3.73%	3.10%

Drawdowns

AMT vs. NVS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMT drawdown since its inception was -98.70%, which is greater than NVS's maximum drawdown of -42.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMT and NVS.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMT	NVS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.70%	-42.10%	-56.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.67%	-10.76%	-15.91%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-45.34%	-20.42%	-24.92%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.34%	-26.03%	-19.31%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-34.82%	-6.65%	-28.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.99%	-10.94%	-16.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.20%	3.66%	+12.54%

Volatility

AMT vs. NVS - Volatility Comparison

American Tower Corporation (AMT) has a higher volatility of 7.17% compared to Novartis AG (NVS) at 6.36%. This indicates that AMT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AMT	NVS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.17%	6.36%	+0.81%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.58%	14.77%	+2.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.02%	21.66%	+3.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.01%	18.51%	+7.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.98%	19.55%	+6.43%

Financials

AMT vs. NVS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between American Tower Corporation and Novartis AG over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

AMT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, American Tower Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.94B and revenue of 2.74B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 70.7%.

NVS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Novartis AG reported a gross profit of 8.40B and revenue of 13.33B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.0%.

AMT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, American Tower Corporation reported an operating income of 1.16B and revenue of 2.74B, resulting in an operating margin of 42.4%.

NVS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Novartis AG reported an operating income of 3.05B and revenue of 13.33B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.8%.

AMT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, American Tower Corporation reported a net income of 821.00M and revenue of 2.74B, resulting in a net margin of 30.0%.

NVS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Novartis AG reported a net income of 2.41B and revenue of 13.33B, resulting in a net margin of 18.1%.