PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
AMT vs. KMB
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


AMTKMB
YTD Return10.11%24.15%
1Y Return35.97%21.46%
3Y Return (Ann)-5.53%5.44%
5Y Return (Ann)2.61%4.77%
10Y Return (Ann)11.39%7.15%
Sharpe Ratio1.321.19
Daily Std Dev25.93%18.09%
Max Drawdown-98.70%-38.17%
Current Drawdown-16.10%-0.20%

Fundamentals


AMTKMB
Market Cap$109.13B$49.96B
EPS$5.33$6.77
PE Ratio43.8321.87
PEG Ratio1.331.62
Total Revenue (TTM)$11.34B$20.28B
Gross Profit (TTM)$6.23B$7.30B
EBITDA (TTM)$7.08B$3.63B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.2

The correlation between AMT and KMB is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

AMT vs. KMB - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, AMT achieves a 10.11% return, which is significantly lower than KMB's 24.15% return. Over the past 10 years, AMT has outperformed KMB with an annualized return of 11.39%, while KMB has yielded a comparatively lower 7.15% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
14.66%
18.89%
AMT
KMB

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


American Tower Corporation

Kimberly-Clark Corporation

Risk-Adjusted Performance

AMT vs. KMB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Tower Corporation (AMT) and Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMT
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for AMT, currently valued at 1.39, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.001.39
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for AMT, currently valued at 2.17, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.17
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for AMT, currently valued at 1.26, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.26
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for AMT, currently valued at 0.79, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.000.79
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for AMT, currently valued at 3.77, compared to the broader market-10.00-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.003.77
KMB
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for KMB, currently valued at 1.19, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.001.19
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for KMB, currently valued at 1.64, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.64
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for KMB, currently valued at 1.24, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.24
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for KMB, currently valued at 1.15, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.001.15
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for KMB, currently valued at 5.69, compared to the broader market-10.00-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.005.69

AMT vs. KMB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMT Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which roughly equals the KMB Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of AMT and KMB.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.00AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
1.39
1.19
AMT
KMB

Dividends

AMT vs. KMB - Dividend Comparison

AMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.81%, less than KMB's 4.07% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
AMT
American Tower Corporation
2.81%2.99%2.77%1.78%2.02%1.64%1.99%1.84%2.05%1.87%1.42%1.38%
KMB
Kimberly-Clark Corporation
3.27%3.88%3.42%3.19%3.17%3.00%3.51%3.22%3.22%2.77%0.99%0.39%

Drawdowns

AMT vs. KMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMT drawdown since its inception was -98.70%, which is greater than KMB's maximum drawdown of -38.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMT and KMB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
-16.10%
-0.20%
AMT
KMB

Volatility

AMT vs. KMB - Volatility Comparison

American Tower Corporation (AMT) has a higher volatility of 5.66% compared to Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) at 3.58%. This indicates that AMT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
5.66%
3.58%
AMT
KMB

Financials

AMT vs. KMB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between American Tower Corporation and Kimberly-Clark Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items