PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
AMT vs. KMB
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between AMT and KMB is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.3

Performance

AMT vs. KMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Tower Corporation (AMT) and Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

200.00%400.00%600.00%800.00%1,000.00%1,200.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
958.71%
287.15%
AMT
KMB

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

AMT:

-0.38

KMB:

0.67

Sortino Ratio

AMT:

-0.37

KMB:

0.99

Omega Ratio

AMT:

0.95

KMB:

1.15

Calmar Ratio

AMT:

-0.24

KMB:

0.71

Martin Ratio

AMT:

-0.85

KMB:

2.93

Ulcer Index

AMT:

11.00%

KMB:

4.12%

Daily Std Dev

AMT:

24.51%

KMB:

18.01%

Max Drawdown

AMT:

-98.70%

KMB:

-39.69%

Current Drawdown

AMT:

-33.14%

KMB:

-10.63%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AMT:

$90.31B

KMB:

$43.73B

EPS

AMT:

$4.15

KMB:

$7.72

PE Ratio

AMT:

46.57

KMB:

16.99

PEG Ratio

AMT:

1.20

KMB:

2.73

Total Revenue (TTM)

AMT:

$11.04B

KMB:

$20.10B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AMT:

$6.09B

KMB:

$7.24B

EBITDA (TTM)

AMT:

$6.91B

KMB:

$4.09B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMT achieves a -12.25% return, which is significantly lower than KMB's 11.21% return. Over the past 10 years, AMT has outperformed KMB with an annualized return of 8.79%, while KMB has yielded a comparatively lower 4.62% annualized return.


AMT

YTD

-12.25%

1M

-7.04%

6M

-3.42%

1Y

-9.51%

5Y*

-1.63%

10Y*

8.79%

KMB

YTD

11.21%

1M

-3.29%

6M

-6.38%

1Y

11.90%

5Y*

2.34%

10Y*

4.62%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

AMT vs. KMB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Tower Corporation (AMT) and Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for AMT, currently valued at -0.38, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.00-0.380.67
The chart of Sortino ratio for AMT, currently valued at -0.37, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.370.99
The chart of Omega ratio for AMT, currently valued at 0.95, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.951.15
The chart of Calmar ratio for AMT, currently valued at -0.24, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.240.71
The chart of Martin ratio for AMT, currently valued at -0.85, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.00-0.852.93
AMT
KMB

The current AMT Sharpe Ratio is -0.38, which is lower than the KMB Sharpe Ratio of 0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMT and KMB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.00JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-0.38
0.67
AMT
KMB

Dividends

AMT vs. KMB - Dividend Comparison

AMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.55%, less than KMB's 3.74% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
AMT
American Tower Corporation
3.55%2.99%2.77%1.78%2.02%1.64%1.99%1.84%2.05%1.87%1.42%1.38%
KMB
Kimberly-Clark Corporation
3.74%3.88%3.42%3.19%3.17%3.00%3.51%3.22%3.22%2.77%0.73%0.00%

Drawdowns

AMT vs. KMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMT drawdown since its inception was -98.70%, which is greater than KMB's maximum drawdown of -39.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMT and KMB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-33.14%
-10.63%
AMT
KMB

Volatility

AMT vs. KMB - Volatility Comparison

American Tower Corporation (AMT) has a higher volatility of 7.38% compared to Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) at 3.98%. This indicates that AMT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
7.38%
3.98%
AMT
KMB

Financials

AMT vs. KMB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between American Tower Corporation and Kimberly-Clark Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab