AMT vs. CCI
AMT (American Tower Corporation) and CCI (Crown Castle International Corp.) are both stocks. Both operate in the REIT - Specialty industry within the Real Estate sector. Over the past 10 years, AMT returned 8.14%/yr vs 3.78%/yr for CCI. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
AMT vs. CCI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMT achieves a 4.84% return, which is significantly higher than CCI's 0.96% return. Over the past 10 years, AMT has outperformed CCI with an annualized return of 8.14%, while CCI has yielded a comparatively lower 3.78% annualized return.
AMT
- 1D
- -1.77%
- 1M
- 0.75%
- YTD
- 4.84%
- 6M
- 5.49%
- 1Y
- -11.45%
- 3Y*
- 1.89%
- 5Y*
- -4.38%
- 10Y*
- 8.14%
CCI
- 1D
- -1.45%
- 1M
- -1.73%
- YTD
- 0.96%
- 6M
- 2.78%
- 1Y
- -7.07%
- 3Y*
- -2.84%
- 5Y*
- -10.63%
- 10Y*
- 3.78%
AMT vs. CCI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMT American Tower Corporation | 4.84% | -0.92% | -12.16% | 5.37% | -25.67% | 32.89% | -0.48% | 47.87% | 13.32% | 37.71% |
CCI Crown Castle International Corp. | 0.96% | 2.96% | -16.39% | -10.24% | -32.57% | 35.08% | 15.49% | 35.45% | 1.75% | 32.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMT and CCI is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 1998 | 0.62 |
Over the past year, AMT and CCI have become more correlated (0.84) than their long-term average of 0.62, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
AMT:
$85.08B
CCI:
$38.73B
AMT:
$6.14
CCI:
$2.42
AMT:
29.66
CCI:
36.57
AMT:
7.89
CCI:
9.19
AMT:
$10.82B
CCI:
$4.21B
AMT:
$7.94B
CCI:
$2.03B
AMT:
$6.71B
CCI:
$2.15B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMT vs. CCI — Risk / Return Rank
AMT
CCI
AMT vs. CCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Tower Corporation (AMT) and Crown Castle International Corp. (CCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AMT | CCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 0.98 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.43 | -0.24 | -0.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.63 | -0.40 | -0.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMT | CCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.50 | -0.27 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.17 | -0.40 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 | 0.15 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.00 |
Drawdowns
AMT vs. CCI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMT drawdown since its inception was -98.70%, roughly equal to the maximum CCI drawdown of -97.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMT and CCI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMT | CCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.70% | -97.52% | -1.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.67% | -30.01% | +3.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.54% | -30.77% | +3.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.34% | -55.48% | +10.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.34% | -55.48% | +10.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.49% | -47.40% | +16.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.02% | -25.90% | -1.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.22% | 17.62% | +0.60% |
Volatility
AMT vs. CCI - Volatility Comparison
American Tower Corporation (AMT) has a higher volatility of 7.26% compared to Crown Castle International Corp. (CCI) at 6.74%. This indicates that AMT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMT | CCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.26% | 6.74% | +0.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.40% | 21.69% | -3.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.21% | 26.15% | -2.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.23% | 26.50% | -0.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.12% | 25.91% | +0.21% |
Dividends
AMT vs. CCI - Dividend Comparison
AMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.78%, less than CCI's 4.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMT American Tower Corporation | 3.78% | 3.87% | 3.53% | 2.99% | 2.77% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 1.64% | 1.99% | 1.84% | 2.05% | 1.87% |
CCI Crown Castle International Corp. | 4.80% | 5.35% | 6.90% | 5.43% | 4.41% | 2.62% | 3.10% | 3.22% | 3.94% | 3.51% | 4.15% | 3.87% |
Financials
AMT vs. CCI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between American Tower Corporation and Crown Castle International Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AMT vs. CCI - Profitability Comparison
AMT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, American Tower Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.02B and revenue of 2.74B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 73.9%.
CCI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Crown Castle International Corp. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.01B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
AMT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, American Tower Corporation reported an operating income of 1.16B and revenue of 2.74B, resulting in an operating margin of 42.4%.
CCI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Crown Castle International Corp. reported an operating income of 465.00M and revenue of 1.01B, resulting in an operating margin of 46.0%.
AMT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, American Tower Corporation reported a net income of 836.80M and revenue of 2.74B, resulting in a net margin of 30.6%.
CCI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Crown Castle International Corp. reported a net income of 151.00M and revenue of 1.01B, resulting in a net margin of 15.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AMT and CCI have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMT has higher volatility (7.26%) compared to CCI (6.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMT dropped -98.70% vs CCI's -97.52%.
CCI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.27 vs -0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AMT and CCI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer