AMSC vs. XES
AMSC (American Superconductor Corporation) is a stock, while XES (SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF) is Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Select Industry Index. Over the past 10 years, AMSC returned 17.66%/yr vs -3.65%/yr for XES. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AMSC vs. XES - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMSC achieves a 44.65% return, which is significantly higher than XES's 39.22% return. Over the past 10 years, AMSC has outperformed XES with an annualized return of 17.66%, while XES has yielded a comparatively lower -3.65% annualized return.
AMSC
- 1D
- -8.15%
- 1M
- -19.70%
- YTD
- 44.65%
- 6M
- 31.04%
- 1Y
- 28.41%
- 3Y*
- 92.13%
- 5Y*
- 18.67%
- 10Y*
- 17.66%
XES
- 1D
- -1.07%
- 1M
- -12.19%
- YTD
- 39.22%
- 6M
- 40.00%
- 1Y
- 79.49%
- 3Y*
- 17.82%
- 5Y*
- 12.58%
- 10Y*
- -3.65%
AMSC vs. XES - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMSC American Superconductor Corporation | 44.65% | 16.85% | 121.10% | 202.72% | -66.18% | -53.54% | 198.34% | -29.60% | 207.16% | -50.75% |
XES SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF | 39.22% | 5.89% | -5.44% | 6.68% | 62.03% | 12.00% | -43.38% | -9.00% | -46.99% | -21.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMSC and XES is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2006 | 0.37 |
The correlation between AMSC and XES shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (1 year) to 0.37 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMSC vs. XES — Risk / Return Rank
AMSC
XES
AMSC vs. XES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) and SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AMSC | XES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.40 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.47 | 5.32 | -4.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.77 | 18.76 | -17.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AMSC vs. XES - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMSC drawdown since its inception was -99.57%, roughly equal to the maximum XES drawdown of -95.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMSC and XES.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMSC | XES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.57% | -95.65% | -3.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -61.08% | -15.03% | -46.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -63.86% | -45.95% | -17.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -82.94% | -45.95% | -36.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -89.06% | -91.23% | +2.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -93.99% | -73.11% | -20.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -75.77% | -54.40% | -21.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 36.89% | 4.25% | +32.64% |
Volatility
AMSC vs. XES - Volatility Comparison
American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) has a higher volatility of 24.07% compared to SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES) at 10.30%. This indicates that AMSC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMSC | XES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.07% | 10.30% | +13.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 55.28% | 20.80% | +34.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 85.75% | 31.19% | +54.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 87.47% | 39.02% | +48.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 79.25% | 44.96% | +34.29% |
Dividends
AMSC vs. XES - Dividend Comparison
AMSC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMSC American Superconductor Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XES SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF | 1.15% | 1.69% | 1.31% | 0.66% | 0.36% | 1.81% | 1.33% | 1.43% | 1.14% | 1.68% | 0.64% | 2.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMSC and XES have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMSC has higher volatility (24.07%) compared to XES (10.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMSC dropped -99.57% vs XES's -95.65%.
XES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AMSC and XES
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer