AMSC vs. XES
AMSC (American Superconductor Corporation) is a stock, while XES (SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF) is Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Select Industry Index. Over the past 10 years, AMSC returned 13.99%/yr vs -3.55%/yr for XES. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AMSC vs. XES - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMSC achieves a 12.96% return, which is significantly lower than XES's 36.58% return. Over the past 10 years, AMSC has outperformed XES with an annualized return of 13.99%, while XES has yielded a comparatively lower -3.55% annualized return.
AMSC
- 1D
- -1.56%
- 1M
- -25.09%
- 6M
- 0.99%
- YTD
- 12.96%
- 1Y
- -23.90%
- 3Y*
- 64.45%
- 5Y*
- 16.64%
- 10Y*
- 13.99%
- ALL TIME*
- -2.77%
XES
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- -1.66%
- 6M
- 21.81%
- YTD
- 36.58%
- 1Y
- 76.01%
- 3Y*
- 8.98%
- 5Y*
- 16.35%
- 10Y*
- -3.55%
- ALL TIME*
- -3.56%
AMSC vs. XES - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMSC American Superconductor Corporation | 12.96% | 16.85% | 121.10% | 202.72% | -66.18% | -53.54% | 198.34% | -29.60% | 207.16% | -50.75% |
XES SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF | 36.58% | 5.89% | -5.44% | 6.68% | 62.03% | 12.00% | -43.38% | -9.00% | -46.99% | -21.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMSC and XES is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2006 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMSC vs. XES — Risk / Return Rank
AMSC
XES
AMSC vs. XES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) and SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AMSC | XES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.39 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.39 | 3.69 | -4.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.62 | 12.53 | -13.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AMSC vs. XES - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMSC drawdown since its inception was -99.57%, roughly equal to the maximum XES drawdown of -95.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMSC and XES.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMSC | XES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.57% | -95.65% | -3.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -61.08% | -20.69% | -40.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -63.86% | -45.95% | -17.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -82.94% | -45.95% | -36.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -89.06% | -91.23% | +2.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.31% | -73.62% | -21.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -75.81% | -54.46% | -21.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 38.78% | 6.09% | +32.69% |
Volatility
AMSC vs. XES - Volatility Comparison
American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) has a higher volatility of 20.17% compared to SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES) at 8.59%. This indicates that AMSC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMSC | XES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.17% | 8.59% | +11.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 55.59% | 21.22% | +34.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 85.99% | 30.63% | +55.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 87.46% | 38.69% | +48.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 79.33% | 44.85% | +34.48% |
Dividends
AMSC vs. XES - Dividend Comparison
AMSC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMSC American Superconductor Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XES SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF | 1.17% | 1.69% | 1.31% | 0.66% | 0.36% | 1.81% | 1.33% | 1.43% | 1.14% | 1.68% | 0.64% | 2.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMSC and XES have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMSC has higher volatility (20.17%) compared to XES (8.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMSC dropped -99.57% vs XES's -95.65%.
XES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs -0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AMSC and XES
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer