AMSC vs. LNG
AMSC (American Superconductor Corporation) and LNG (Cheniere Energy, Inc.) are both stocks. AMSC operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials), while LNG operates in Oil & Gas Midstream (Energy). Over the past 10 years, AMSC returned 12.68%/yr vs 21.52%/yr for LNG. Their 0.16 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
AMSC vs. LNG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMSC achieves a 2.05% return, which is significantly lower than LNG's 36.26% return. Over the past 10 years, AMSC has underperformed LNG with an annualized return of 12.68%, while LNG has yielded a comparatively higher 21.52% annualized return.
AMSC
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- -26.43%
- 6M
- -1.84%
- YTD
- 2.05%
- 1Y
- -48.34%
- 3Y*
- 22.11%
- 5Y*
- 15.89%
- 10Y*
- 12.68%
- ALL TIME*
- -3.05%
LNG
- 1D
- 2.14%
- 1M
- 8.06%
- 6M
- 25.23%
- YTD
- 36.26%
- 1Y
- 12.83%
- 3Y*
- 19.21%
- 5Y*
- 26.62%
- 10Y*
- 21.52%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.85%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $27.27M | $25.36M | $48.11M | |
| $449.81M | $470.16M | $533.59M |
AMSC vs. LNG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMSC American Superconductor Corporation | 2.05% | 16.85% | 121.10% | 202.72% | -66.18% | -53.54% | 198.34% | -29.60% | 207.16% | -50.75% |
LNG Cheniere Energy, Inc. | 36.26% | -8.70% | 27.18% | 15.02% | 49.30% | 69.48% | -1.70% | 3.18% | 9.94% | 29.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMSC and LNG is -0.12, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.12 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 1997 | 0.16 |
The correlation between AMSC and LNG shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.18 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
AMSC:
$1.42B
LNG:
$55.23B
AMSC:
$2.95
LNG:
$6.86
AMSC:
9.94
LNG:
38.44
AMSC:
0.02
LNG:
0.21
AMSC:
4.45
LNG:
2.80
AMSC:
2.47
LNG:
14.78
AMSC:
$299.15M
LNG:
$20.28B
AMSC:
$91.38M
LNG:
$5.52B
AMSC:
$19.29M
LNG:
$5.81B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMSC vs. LNG — Risk / Return Rank
AMSC
LNG
AMSC vs. LNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) and Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AMSC | LNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.10 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.79 | 0.54 | -1.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.21 | 1.00 | -2.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AMSC vs. LNG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMSC drawdown since its inception was -99.57%, roughly equal to the maximum LNG drawdown of -97.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMSC and LNG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMSC | LNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.57% | -97.84% | -1.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -61.08% | -24.09% | -36.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -61.08% | -24.87% | -36.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -82.94% | -24.87% | -58.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -89.06% | -57.53% | -31.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.76% | -11.02% | -84.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -75.83% | -43.02% | -32.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 40.10% | 12.86% | +27.24% |
Volatility
AMSC vs. LNG - Volatility Comparison
American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) has a higher volatility of 22.38% compared to Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) at 9.48%. This indicates that AMSC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMSC | LNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.38% | 9.48% | +12.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 57.61% | 23.32% | +34.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 87.44% | 26.45% | +60.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 87.66% | 30.42% | +57.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 79.49% | 32.28% | +47.21% |
Dividends
AMSC vs. LNG - Dividend Comparison
AMSC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMSC American Superconductor Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LNG Cheniere Energy, Inc. | 0.82% | 1.06% | 0.84% | 0.95% | 0.92% | 0.33% |
Financials
AMSC vs. LNG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between American Superconductor Corporation and Cheniere Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AMSC vs. LNG - Profitability Comparison
AMSC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, American Superconductor Corporation reported a gross profit of 23.60M and revenue of 86.41M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.3%.
LNG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 5.87B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
AMSC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, American Superconductor Corporation reported an operating income of -522.00K and revenue of 86.41M, resulting in an operating margin of -0.6%.
LNG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of -3.49B and revenue of 5.87B, resulting in an operating margin of -59.4%.
AMSC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, American Superconductor Corporation reported a net income of 4.53M and revenue of 86.41M, resulting in a net margin of 5.2%.
LNG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported a net income of -3.50B and revenue of 5.87B, resulting in a net margin of -59.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AMSC and LNG have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMSC has higher volatility (22.38%) compared to LNG (9.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMSC dropped -99.57% vs LNG's -97.84%.
LNG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.49 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AMSC and LNG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer