AMPL vs. IGV
AMPL (Amplitude, Inc.) is a stock, while IGV (iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF) is Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P North American Expanded Technology Software Index. Over the past 3 years, AMPL returned -14.43%/yr vs 9.05%/yr for IGV. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
AMPL vs. IGV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMPL achieves a -42.49% return, which is significantly lower than IGV's -17.37% return.
AMPL
- 1D
- 3.10%
- 1M
- -0.60%
- YTD
- -42.49%
- 6M
- -42.64%
- 1Y
- -43.61%
- 3Y*
- -14.43%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IGV
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- -7.10%
- YTD
- -17.37%
- 6M
- -19.19%
- 1Y
- -17.89%
- 3Y*
- 9.05%
- 5Y*
- 2.37%
- 10Y*
- 15.70%
AMPL vs. IGV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMPL Amplitude, Inc. | -42.49% | 9.76% | -17.06% | 5.30% | -77.18% | 5.88% |
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF | -17.37% | 5.56% | 23.41% | 58.56% | -35.65% | -4.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMPL and IGV is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2021 | 0.63 |
The correlation between AMPL and IGV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMPL vs. IGV — Risk / Return Rank
AMPL
IGV
AMPL vs. IGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplitude, Inc. (AMPL) and iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AMPL | IGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 0.91 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.76 | -0.49 | -0.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.33 | -1.00 | -0.34 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AMPL vs. IGV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMPL drawdown since its inception was -93.38%, which is greater than IGV's maximum drawdown of -63.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMPL and IGV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMPL | IGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.38% | -63.45% | -29.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -57.79% | -36.61% | -21.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -61.15% | -36.61% | -24.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -45.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -92.15% | -25.85% | -66.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -81.31% | -14.46% | -66.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 32.71% | 17.94% | +14.77% |
Volatility
AMPL vs. IGV - Volatility Comparison
Amplitude, Inc. (AMPL) has a higher volatility of 21.54% compared to iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) at 12.71%. This indicates that AMPL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMPL | IGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.54% | 12.71% | +8.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 51.78% | 24.86% | +26.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 60.17% | 28.27% | +31.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 65.18% | 27.97% | +37.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 65.18% | 26.38% | +38.80% |
Dividends
AMPL vs. IGV - Dividend Comparison
AMPL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMPL Amplitude, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.35% | 0.02% | 0.16% | 0.09% | 0.82% | 0.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMPL and IGV have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMPL has higher volatility (21.54%) compared to IGV (12.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMPL dropped -93.38% vs IGV's -63.45%.
IGV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.64 vs -0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AMPL and IGV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer