AMPL vs. QTUM
AMPL (Amplitude, Inc.) is a stock, while QTUM (Defiance Quantum ETF) is Technology Equities fund tracking the BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index. Over the past 3 years, AMPL returned -6.27%/yr vs 52.22%/yr for QTUM. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
AMPL vs. QTUM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMPL achieves a -29.97% return, which is significantly lower than QTUM's 53.29% return.
AMPL
- 1D
- -2.76%
- 1M
- 0.87%
- YTD
- -29.97%
- 6M
- -23.78%
- 1Y
- -36.69%
- 3Y*
- -6.27%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QTUM
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- 23.63%
- YTD
- 53.29%
- 6M
- 50.69%
- 1Y
- 95.36%
- 3Y*
- 52.22%
- 5Y*
- 29.15%
- 10Y*
- —
AMPL vs. QTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMPL Amplitude, Inc. | -29.97% | 9.76% | -17.06% | 5.30% | -77.18% | -3.39% |
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 53.29% | 36.65% | 50.54% | 39.86% | -28.80% | 10.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMPL and QTUM is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2021 | 0.52 |
The correlation between AMPL and QTUM shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (1 year) to 0.52 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMPL vs. QTUM — Risk / Return Rank
AMPL
QTUM
AMPL vs. QTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplitude, Inc. (AMPL) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AMPL | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.55 | -0.63 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.64 | 6.28 | -6.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.19 | 23.69 | -24.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMPL | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.61 | 3.65 | -4.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.10 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.52 | 1.08 | -1.59 |
Drawdowns
AMPL vs. QTUM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMPL drawdown since its inception was -93.38%, which is greater than QTUM's maximum drawdown of -38.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMPL and QTUM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMPL | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.38% | -38.45% | -54.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -57.79% | -15.26% | -42.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -61.15% | -25.39% | -35.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -38.45% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -90.44% | -0.59% | -89.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -81.26% | -8.25% | -73.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.89% | 4.04% | +26.85% |
Volatility
AMPL vs. QTUM - Volatility Comparison
Amplitude, Inc. (AMPL) has a higher volatility of 33.53% compared to Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) at 9.76%. This indicates that AMPL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMPL | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 33.53% | 9.76% | +23.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 51.85% | 20.35% | +31.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 60.55% | 26.26% | +34.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 65.27% | 26.56% | +38.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 65.27% | 27.17% | +38.10% |
Dividends
AMPL vs. QTUM - Dividend Comparison
AMPL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QTUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMPL Amplitude, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 0.70% | 1.01% | 0.61% | 0.81% | 1.46% | 0.48% | 0.42% | 0.61% | 0.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMPL and QTUM have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMPL has higher volatility (33.53%) compared to QTUM (9.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMPL dropped -93.38% vs QTUM's -38.45%.
QTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.65 vs -0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AMPL and QTUM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer