PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMPL vs. QTUM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMPL vs. QTUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplitude, Inc. (AMPL) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMPL achieves a -29.97% return, which is significantly lower than QTUM's 53.29% return.


AMPL

1D
-2.76%
1M
0.87%
YTD
-29.97%
6M
-23.78%
1Y
-36.69%
3Y*
-6.27%
5Y*
10Y*

QTUM

1D
-0.59%
1M
23.63%
YTD
53.29%
6M
50.69%
1Y
95.36%
3Y*
52.22%
5Y*
29.15%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMPL vs. QTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
AMPL
Amplitude, Inc.
-29.97%9.76%-17.06%5.30%-77.18%-3.39%
QTUM
Defiance Quantum ETF
53.29%36.65%50.54%39.86%-28.80%10.25%

Correlation

The correlation between AMPL and QTUM is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2021

0.52

The correlation between AMPL and QTUM shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (1 year) to 0.52 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMPL vs. QTUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMPL
AMPL Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
AMPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMPL Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
AMPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMPL Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

QTUM
QTUM Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
QTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
QTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMPL vs. QTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplitude, Inc. (AMPL) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMPLQTUMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

1.55

-0.63

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.64

6.28

-6.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.19

23.69

-24.88

AMPL vs. QTUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMPL Sharpe Ratio is -0.61, which is lower than the QTUM Sharpe Ratio of 3.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMPL and QTUM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMPLQTUMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.61

3.65

-4.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.52

1.08

-1.59

Drawdowns

AMPL vs. QTUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMPL drawdown since its inception was -93.38%, which is greater than QTUM's maximum drawdown of -38.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMPL and QTUM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMPLQTUMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.38%

-38.45%

-54.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-57.79%

-15.26%

-42.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-61.15%

-25.39%

-35.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-90.44%

-0.59%

-89.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-81.26%

-8.25%

-73.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

30.89%

4.04%

+26.85%

Volatility

AMPL vs. QTUM - Volatility Comparison

Amplitude, Inc. (AMPL) has a higher volatility of 33.53% compared to Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) at 9.76%. This indicates that AMPL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMPLQTUMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

33.53%

9.76%

+23.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

51.85%

20.35%

+31.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

60.55%

26.26%

+34.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

65.27%

26.56%

+38.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

65.27%

27.17%

+38.10%

Dividends

AMPL vs. QTUM - Dividend Comparison

AMPL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QTUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
AMPL
Amplitude, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QTUM
Defiance Quantum ETF
0.70%1.01%0.61%0.81%1.46%0.48%0.42%0.61%0.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMPL and QTUM have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMPL has higher volatility (33.53%) compared to QTUM (9.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMPL dropped -93.38% vs QTUM's -38.45%.

QTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.65 vs -0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMPL and QTUM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer