AMPL vs. MLPA

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

AMPL (Amplitude, Inc.) is a stock, while MLPA (Global X MLP ETF) is MLPs fund tracking the Solactive MLP Infrastructure Index. Over the past 3 years, AMPL returned -14.43%/yr vs 16.94%/yr for MLPA. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

AMPL vs. MLPA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplitude, Inc. (AMPL) and Global X MLP ETF (MLPA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMPL achieves a -42.49% return, which is significantly lower than MLPA's 14.27% return.

AMPL

• 1D: 3.10%
• 1M: -0.60%
• YTD: -42.49%
• 6M: -42.64%
• 1Y: -43.61%
• 3Y*: -14.43%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MLPA

• 1D: 1.78%
• 1M: -4.45%
• YTD: 14.27%
• 6M: 14.04%
• 1Y: 15.23%
• 3Y*: 16.94%
• 5Y*: 14.82%
• 10Y*: 6.04%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMPL vs. MLPA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
AMPL Amplitude, Inc.	-42.49%	9.76%	-17.06%	5.30%	-77.18%	5.88%
MLPA Global X MLP ETF	14.27%	5.73%	20.35%	15.93%	27.03%	-0.01%

Correlation

The correlation between AMPL and MLPA is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.03
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.17
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2021	0.21

The correlation between AMPL and MLPA shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

AMPL vs. MLPA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMPL

AMPL Risk / Return Rank: 13
AMPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
AMPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
AMPL Omega Ratio Rank: 14
AMPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
AMPL Martin Ratio Rank: 11

MLPA

MLPA Risk / Return Rank: 36
MLPA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
MLPA Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
MLPA Omega Ratio Rank: 33
MLPA Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
MLPA Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMPL vs. MLPA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplitude, Inc. (AMPL) and Global X MLP ETF (MLPA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AMPL	MLPA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.73	1.26	-1.99
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.88	1.83	-2.71
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.89	1.21	-0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.76	1.84	-2.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.33	5.17	-6.50

AMPL vs. MLPA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMPL Sharpe Ratio is -0.73, which is lower than the MLPA Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMPL and MLPA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AMPL vs. MLPA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMPL drawdown since its inception was -93.38%, which is greater than MLPA's maximum drawdown of -78.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMPL and MLPA.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMPL	MLPA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-93.38%	-78.75%	-14.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-57.79%	-8.33%	-49.46%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-61.15%	-14.20%	-46.95%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-18.75%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-74.05%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-92.15%	-5.33%	-86.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-81.31%	-20.21%	-61.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	32.71%	2.96%	+29.75%

Volatility

AMPL vs. MLPA - Volatility Comparison

Amplitude, Inc. (AMPL) has a higher volatility of 21.54% compared to Global X MLP ETF (MLPA) at 4.66%. This indicates that AMPL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MLPA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AMPL	MLPA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	21.54%	4.66%	+16.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	51.78%	8.76%	+43.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	60.17%	12.14%	+48.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	65.18%	18.08%	+47.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	65.18%	27.44%	+37.74%

Dividends

AMPL vs. MLPA - Dividend Comparison

AMPL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MLPA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.39%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AMPL Amplitude, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MLPA Global X MLP ETF	7.39%	7.82%	7.25%	7.49%	7.30%	8.72%	13.84%	9.09%	10.00%	8.05%	7.15%	9.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMPL and MLPA in my portfolio?

AMPL and MLPA have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AMPL or MLPA?

AMPL has higher volatility (21.54%) compared to MLPA (4.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMPL dropped -93.38% vs MLPA's -78.75%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MLPA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.26 vs -0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.