AMPL vs. MLPA

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Amplitude, Inc. (AMPL) and Global X MLP ETF (MLPA).

MLPA is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive MLP Infrastructure Index. It was launched on Apr 18, 2012.

Performance

AMPL vs. MLPA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplitude, Inc. (AMPL) and Global X MLP ETF (MLPA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

AMPL vs. MLPA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
AMPL Amplitude, Inc.	-41.11%	9.76%	-17.06%	5.30%	-77.18%	-3.39%
MLPA Global X MLP ETF	13.45%	5.73%	20.35%	15.93%	27.03%	1.01%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMPL achieves a -41.11% return, which is significantly lower than MLPA's 13.45% return.

AMPL

• 1D: 0.29%
• 1M: -6.58%
• YTD: -41.11%
• 6M: -36.38%
• 1Y: -33.07%
• 3Y*: -18.16%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MLPA

• 1D: -1.37%
• 1M: 0.67%
• YTD: 13.45%
• 6M: 15.77%
• 1Y: 9.41%
• 3Y*: 17.72%
• 5Y*: 18.64%
• 10Y*: 8.14%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

AMPL vs. MLPA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMPL

AMPL Risk / Return Rank: 16
AMPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
AMPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
AMPL Omega Ratio Rank: 18
AMPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
AMPL Martin Ratio Rank: 10

MLPA

MLPA Risk / Return Rank: 30
MLPA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
MLPA Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
MLPA Omega Ratio Rank: 31
MLPA Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
MLPA Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMPL vs. MLPA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplitude, Inc. (AMPL) and Global X MLP ETF (MLPA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AMPL	MLPA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.59	0.59	-1.18
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.63	0.86	-1.49
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.93	1.12	-0.19
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.66	0.63	-1.29
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.49	1.56	-3.05
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AMPL vs. MLPA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMPL Sharpe Ratio is -0.59, which is lower than the MLPA Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMPL and MLPA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AMPL	MLPA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.59	0.59	-1.18
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.02	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.30	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.58	0.16	-0.74

Correlation

The correlation between AMPL and MLPA is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

AMPL vs. MLPA - Dividend Comparison

AMPL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MLPA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.15%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AMPL Amplitude, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MLPA Global X MLP ETF	7.15%	7.82%	7.25%	7.49%	7.30%	8.72%	13.84%	9.09%	10.00%	8.05%	7.15%	9.29%

Drawdowns

AMPL vs. MLPA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMPL drawdown since its inception was -92.68%, which is greater than MLPA's maximum drawdown of -78.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMPL and MLPA.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMPL	MLPA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-92.68%	-78.75%	-13.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-53.27%	-14.20%	-39.07%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-18.75%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-74.05%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-91.96%	-2.87%	-89.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-80.85%	-20.50%	-60.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	23.69%	5.73%	+17.96%

Volatility

AMPL vs. MLPA - Volatility Comparison

Amplitude, Inc. (AMPL) has a higher volatility of 12.57% compared to Global X MLP ETF (MLPA) at 3.34%. This indicates that AMPL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MLPA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AMPL	MLPA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.57%	3.34%	+9.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	38.90%	7.92%	+30.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	56.02%	16.09%	+39.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	64.06%	18.41%	+45.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	64.06%	27.64%	+36.42%