AMOM vs. SMOM
AMOM (QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF) and SMOM (Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AMOM is a Momentum fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts, while SMOM is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Symmetry Partners. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AMOM charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for SMOM.
Performance
AMOM vs. SMOM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMOM achieves a 26.78% return, which is significantly higher than SMOM's 7.03% return.
AMOM
- 1D
- -4.33%
- 1M
- 5.97%
- YTD
- 26.78%
- 6M
- 24.27%
- 1Y
- 40.35%
- 3Y*
- 26.54%
- 5Y*
- 11.70%
- 10Y*
- —
SMOM
- 1D
- -1.16%
- 1M
- -0.47%
- YTD
- 7.03%
- 6M
- 6.00%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMOM vs. SMOM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AMOM QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF | 26.78% | 4.77% |
SMOM Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF | 7.03% | 2.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMOM and SMOM is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2025 | 0.81 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMOM vs. SMOM — Risk / Return Rank
AMOM
SMOM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
AMOM vs. SMOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF (AMOM) and Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF (SMOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AMOM | SMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.09 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.70 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AMOM vs. SMOM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMOM drawdown since its inception was -39.68%, which is greater than SMOM's maximum drawdown of -7.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMOM and SMOM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMOM | SMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.68% | -7.45% | -32.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.10% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.26% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.68% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.33% | -2.54% | -1.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.75% | -1.49% | -9.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.78% | — | — |
Volatility
AMOM vs. SMOM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMOM | SMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.24% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.66% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.29% | 12.80% | +11.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.26% | 12.80% | +11.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.22% | 12.80% | +12.42% |
AMOM vs. SMOM - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMOM has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SMOM's 0.63% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMOM vs. SMOM - Dividend Comparison
AMOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than SMOM's 0.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMOM QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF | 0.07% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.47% | 0.72% | 0.74% | 24.31% | 5.51% |
SMOM Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF | 0.15% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMOM and SMOM have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SMOM is cheaper at 0.63% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SMOM is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AMOM.
SMOM has the higher dividend yield at 0.15%, compared with 0.07% for AMOM.
AMOM is categorized as Momentum, while SMOM is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Symmetry Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AMOM and 0.63% for SMOM.
Find the right allocation for AMOM and SMOM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer