PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMOM vs. SIXH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMOM vs. SIXH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF (AMOM) and 6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF (SIXH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMOM achieves a 27.93% return, which is significantly higher than SIXH's 7.20% return.


AMOM

1D
1.02%
1M
12.16%
YTD
27.93%
6M
28.91%
1Y
43.17%
3Y*
28.22%
5Y*
12.53%
10Y*

SIXH

1D
0.48%
1M
-0.21%
YTD
7.20%
6M
8.70%
1Y
10.61%
3Y*
12.22%
5Y*
8.95%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMOM vs. SIXH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
AMOM
QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF
27.93%7.69%35.79%27.06%-26.29%13.08%44.26%
SIXH
6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF
7.20%9.47%12.06%4.93%6.90%18.37%5.83%

Correlation

The correlation between AMOM and SIXH is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2020

0.31

The correlation between AMOM and SIXH shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.31 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

AMOM vs. SIXH - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AMOM
SIXH

Technology

41.9%
20.2%

Industrials

14.5%
7.8%

Communication Services

14.3%
13.3%

Healthcare

7.7%
12.6%

Financial Services

6.2%
9.7%

Consumer Cyclical

5.8%
6.8%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
23.2%

Utilities

3.8%
5.0%

Basic Materials

2.7%
0.1%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.4%

Energy

1.2%
0.1%

Technology

AMOM
41.9%
SIXH
20.2%

Industrials

AMOM
14.5%
SIXH
7.8%

Communication Services

AMOM
14.3%
SIXH
13.3%

Healthcare

AMOM
7.7%
SIXH
12.6%

Financial Services

AMOM
6.2%
SIXH
9.7%

Consumer Cyclical

AMOM
5.8%
SIXH
6.8%

Consumer Defensive

AMOM
5.0%
SIXH
23.2%

Utilities

AMOM
3.8%
SIXH
5.0%

Basic Materials

AMOM
2.7%
SIXH
0.1%

Real Estate

AMOM
1.9%
SIXH
1.4%

Energy

AMOM
1.2%
SIXH
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMOM vs. SIXH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMOM
AMOM Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
AMOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMOM Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
AMOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMOM Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

SIXH
SIXH Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
SIXH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIXH Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIXH Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
SIXH Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIXH Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMOM vs. SIXH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF (AMOM) and 6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF (SIXH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMOMSIXHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.25

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.31

2.44

+0.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.88

6.25

+5.63

AMOM vs. SIXH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMOM Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is higher than the SIXH Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMOM and SIXH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMOMSIXHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.01

1.40

+0.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.87

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

1.05

-0.30

Drawdowns

AMOM vs. SIXH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMOM drawdown since its inception was -39.68%, which is greater than SIXH's maximum drawdown of -11.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMOM and SIXH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMOMSIXHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.68%

-11.68%

-28.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.10%

-4.36%

-8.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.26%

-9.10%

-21.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.68%

-11.68%

-28.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.42%

+2.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.81%

-1.85%

-8.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.64%

1.70%

+1.94%

Volatility

AMOM vs. SIXH - Volatility Comparison

QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF (AMOM) has a higher volatility of 7.11% compared to 6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF (SIXH) at 2.31%. This indicates that AMOM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SIXH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMOMSIXHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.11%

2.31%

+4.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.71%

6.02%

+10.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.58%

7.60%

+13.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.74%

10.37%

+13.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.95%

10.15%

+14.80%

AMOM vs. SIXH - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMOM has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than SIXH's 0.87% expense ratio.


Dividends

AMOM vs. SIXH - Dividend Comparison

AMOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than SIXH's 1.90% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
AMOM
QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF
0.07%0.09%0.00%0.47%0.72%0.74%24.31%5.51%
SIXH
6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF
1.90%2.23%1.55%2.04%2.06%1.65%1.10%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMOM and SIXH have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMOM has higher volatility (7.11%) compared to SIXH (2.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMOM dropped -39.68% vs SIXH's -11.68%.

On 5-year performance, AMOM leads with 12.53% vs 8.95% for SIXH. On fees, AMOM is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, SIXH has been the lower-risk option at 2.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, AMOM has performed better with a 12.53% return vs 8.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AMOM is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for SIXH.

SIXH has the higher dividend yield at 1.90%, compared with 0.07% for AMOM.

AMOM is categorized as Momentum, while SIXH is Volatility Hedged Equity. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AMOM and 0.87% for SIXH.

AMOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMOM and SIXH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer