AMNA vs. FBGX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Index ETN (AMNA) and UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN (FBGX).

AMNA and FBGX are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AMNA is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. It was launched on Jun 19, 2020. FBGX is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index (200%). It was launched on Jun 11, 2014. Both AMNA and FBGX are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

AMNA vs. FBGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Index ETN (AMNA) and UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN (FBGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

AMNA vs. FBGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
AMNA ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Index ETN	44.30%	12.50%	20.41%	36.44%	2.88%
FBGX UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN	35.73%	83.74%	-56.41%	57.04%	54.04%

Returns By Period

AMNA

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FBGX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMNA vs. FBGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMNA has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than FBGX's 1.29% expense ratio.

FBGX

UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN

AMNA

ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Index ETN

Return for Risk

AMNA vs. FBGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Index ETN (AMNA) and UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN (FBGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Correlation

The correlation between AMNA and FBGX is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

AMNA vs. FBGX - Dividend Comparison

Neither AMNA nor FBGX has paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2023	2022	2021	2020
AMNA ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Index ETN	0.00%	5.61%	5.48%	5.84%	2.12%
FBGX UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

Volatility