AMDW vs. QQA

Last updated Jun 28, 2026

AMDW (Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF) and QQA (Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AMDW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for QQA.

Performance

AMDW vs. QQA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW) and Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMDW achieves a 176.52% return, which is significantly higher than QQA's 10.77% return.

AMDW

• 1D: -2.94%
• 1M: -0.08%
• YTD: 176.52%
• 6M: 174.50%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QQA

• 1D: -0.85%
• 1M: -2.42%
• YTD: 10.77%
• 6M: 9.63%
• 1Y: 23.87%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMDW vs. QQA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF	176.52%	36.56%
QQA Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF	10.77%	9.25%

Correlation

The correlation between AMDW and QQA is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025	0.61

AMDW vs. QQA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AMDW	QQA
Technology	22.6%	58.7%
Basic Materials	-	1.0%
Communication Services	-	14.3%
Consumer Cyclical	-	11.4%
Consumer Defensive	-	6.4%
Energy	-	0.5%
Financial Services	-	0.2%
Healthcare	-	3.7%
Industrials	-	2.6%
Real Estate	-	0.1%
Utilities	-	1.2%

Return for Risk

AMDW vs. QQA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMDW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QQA

QQA Risk / Return Rank: 61
QQA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
QQA Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
QQA Omega Ratio Rank: 57
QQA Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
QQA Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMDW vs. QQA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW) and Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AMDW	QQA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.72	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.35	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.31	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.75	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	11.64	—

Drawdowns

AMDW vs. QQA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMDW drawdown since its inception was -34.64%, which is greater than QQA's maximum drawdown of -19.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMDW and QQA.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMDW	QQA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.64%	-19.73%	-14.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.76%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.03%	-3.51%	-3.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.15%	-2.53%	-11.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.06%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AMDW	QQA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	6.75%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	11.39%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	83.01%	14.00%	+69.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	83.01%	18.58%	+64.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	83.01%	18.58%	+64.43%

AMDW vs. QQA - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMDW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than QQA's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

AMDW vs. QQA - Dividend Comparison

AMDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 37.07%, more than QQA's 9.84% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF	37.07%	34.78%	0.00%
QQA Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF	9.84%	9.78%	4.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMDW and QQA in my portfolio?

AMDW and QQA have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AMDW or QQA?

On fees, QQA is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AMDW or QQA?

QQA is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AMDW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AMDW or QQA?

AMDW has the higher dividend yield at 37.07%, compared with 9.84% for QQA.

What is the main difference between AMDW and QQA?

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for AMDW and 0.29% for QQA.