PortfoliosLab logo
QQA vs. XLG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between QQA and XLG is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

QQA vs. XLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA) and Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF (XLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
3.09%
0.77%
QQA
XLG

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

QQA:

23.70%

XLG:

21.84%

Max Drawdown

QQA:

-19.73%

XLG:

-52.39%

Current Drawdown

QQA:

-8.05%

XLG:

-9.74%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQA achieves a -3.75% return, which is significantly higher than XLG's -6.54% return.


QQA

YTD

-3.75%

1M

3.58%

6M

-3.65%

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

XLG

YTD

-6.54%

1M

3.17%

6M

-6.11%

1Y

11.22%

5Y*

17.06%

10Y*

14.17%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QQA vs. XLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQA has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than XLG's 0.20% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

QQA vs. XLG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQA

XLG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of XLG is 6161
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of XLG is 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of XLG is 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of XLG is 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of XLG is 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of XLG is 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

QQA vs. XLG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA) and Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF (XLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Chart placeholderNot enough data

Dividends

QQA vs. XLG - Dividend Comparison

QQA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.16%, more than XLG's 0.78% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
QQA
Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF
8.16%4.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XLG
Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF
0.78%0.72%0.97%1.34%0.94%1.25%1.58%2.00%1.85%2.00%2.09%1.97%

Drawdowns

QQA vs. XLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQA drawdown since its inception was -19.73%, smaller than the maximum XLG drawdown of -52.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQA and XLG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-8.05%
-9.74%
QQA
XLG

Volatility

QQA vs. XLG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA) is 6.83%, while Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF (XLG) has a volatility of 7.53%. This indicates that QQA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
6.83%
7.53%
QQA
XLG