PortfoliosLab logo
QQA vs. QQQI
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between QQA and QQQI is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

QQA vs. QQQI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA) and NEOS Nasdaq 100 High Income ETF (QQQI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
3.18%
5.55%
QQA
QQQI

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

QQA:

23.76%

QQQI:

21.20%

Max Drawdown

QQA:

-19.73%

QQQI:

-20.00%

Current Drawdown

QQA:

-7.97%

QQQI:

-7.24%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQA achieves a -3.67% return, which is significantly lower than QQQI's -2.51% return.


QQA

YTD

-3.67%

1M

14.65%

6M

-2.83%

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

QQQI

YTD

-2.51%

1M

15.94%

6M

-1.24%

1Y

12.21%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QQA vs. QQQI - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQA has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQI's 0.68% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

QQA vs. QQQI — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQA

QQQI
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QQQI is 6666
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QQQI is 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QQQI is 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QQQI is 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QQQI is 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QQQI is 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

QQA vs. QQQI - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA) and NEOS Nasdaq 100 High Income ETF (QQQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Chart placeholderNot enough data

Dividends

QQA vs. QQQI - Dividend Comparison

QQA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.15%, less than QQQI's 14.99% yield.


Drawdowns

QQA vs. QQQI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQA drawdown since its inception was -19.73%, roughly equal to the maximum QQQI drawdown of -20.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQA and QQQI. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-7.97%
-7.24%
QQA
QQQI

Volatility

QQA vs. QQQI - Volatility Comparison

Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA) and NEOS Nasdaq 100 High Income ETF (QQQI) have volatilities of 12.01% and 12.43%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
12.01%
12.43%
QQA
QQQI