QQA vs. QQQI
QQA (Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF) and QQQI (NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQA is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Invesco, while QQQI is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Neos. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, QQA returned 33.20% vs 31.46% for QQQI. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QQA charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for QQQI.
Performance
QQA vs. QQQI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQA achieves a 14.68% return, which is significantly higher than QQQI's 13.63% return.
QQA
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 7.02%
- YTD
- 14.68%
- 6M
- 14.53%
- 1Y
- 33.20%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQI
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 6.99%
- YTD
- 13.63%
- 6M
- 13.39%
- 1Y
- 31.46%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQA vs. QQQI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QQA Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF | 14.68% | 17.24% | 7.11% |
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF | 13.63% | 18.62% | 8.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQA and QQQI is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2024 | 0.95 |
The correlation between QQA and QQQI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
QQA vs. QQQI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QQA
QQQI
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Financial Services
Real Estate
Technology
QQA
QQQI
Communication Services
QQA
QQQI
Consumer Cyclical
QQA
QQQI
Consumer Defensive
QQA
QQQI
Healthcare
QQA
QQQI
Industrials
QQA
QQQI
Utilities
QQA
QQQI
Basic Materials
QQA
QQQI
Energy
QQA
QQQI
Financial Services
QQA
QQQI
Real Estate
QQA
QQQI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQA vs. QQQI — Risk / Return Rank
QQA
QQQI
QQA vs. QQQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QQA | QQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.65 | 2.44 | +0.21 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.56 | 3.21 | +0.35 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.45 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.91 | 3.34 | +0.57 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.57 | 15.01 | +2.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQA | QQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.65 | 2.44 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.18 | 1.34 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
QQA vs. QQQI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQA drawdown since its inception was -19.73%, roughly equal to the maximum QQQI drawdown of -20.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQA and QQQI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQA | QQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.73% | -20.00% | +0.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.76% | -9.61% | +0.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.45% | -2.20% | -0.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.95% | 2.14% | -0.19% |
Volatility
QQA vs. QQQI - Volatility Comparison
Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA) has a higher volatility of 2.91% compared to NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) at 2.67%. This indicates that QQA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQA | QQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.91% | 2.67% | +0.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.68% | 9.85% | -0.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.61% | 12.98% | -0.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.29% | 17.08% | +1.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.29% | 17.08% | +1.21% |
QQA vs. QQQI - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQA has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQI's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
QQA vs. QQQI - Dividend Comparison
QQA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.28%, less than QQQI's 13.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
QQA Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF | 9.28% | 9.78% | 4.29% |
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF | 13.17% | 13.82% | 12.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, QQA and QQQI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
QQA has higher volatility (2.91%) compared to QQQI (2.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQA dropped -19.73% vs QQQI's -20.00%.
On 1-year performance, QQA leads with 33.20% vs 31.46% for QQQI. On fees, QQA is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, QQQI has been the lower-risk option at 2.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QQA has performed better with a 33.20% return vs 31.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQA is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for QQQI.
QQQI has the higher dividend yield at 13.17%, compared with 9.28% for QQA.
QQA is categorized as Derivative Income, while QQQI is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for QQA and 0.68% for QQQI.
QQA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 2.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QQA and QQQI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer