PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQA vs. MSTY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQA vs. MSTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA) and YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQA achieves a 12.08% return, which is significantly higher than MSTY's -35.55% return.


QQA

1D
-1.42%
1M
-0.25%
6M
10.17%
YTD
12.08%
1Y
24.09%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MSTY

1D
-2.03%
1M
-23.27%
6M
-39.01%
YTD
-35.55%
1Y
-73.76%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQA vs. MSTY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QQA
Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF
12.08%17.24%5.92%
MSTY
YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF
-35.55%-42.71%56.47%

Correlation

The correlation between QQA and MSTY is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2024

0.46

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQA vs. MSTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQA
QQA Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
QQA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQA Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
QQA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQA Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

MSTY
MSTY Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
MSTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSTY Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
MSTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSTY Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQA vs. MSTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA) and YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QQAMSTYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

0.75

+0.55

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.76

-0.95

+3.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.52

-1.41

+12.93

QQA vs. MSTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQA Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is higher than the MSTY Sharpe Ratio of -1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQA and MSTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QQA vs. MSTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQA drawdown since its inception was -19.73%, smaller than the maximum MSTY drawdown of -77.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQA and MSTY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQAMSTYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.73%

-77.40%

+57.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.76%

-77.40%

+68.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.37%

-74.66%

+72.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.52%

-28.01%

+25.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.10%

52.19%

-50.09%

Volatility

QQA vs. MSTY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA) is 6.49%, while YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY) has a volatility of 23.76%. This indicates that QQA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQAMSTYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.49%

23.76%

-17.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.99%

53.06%

-41.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.51%

64.61%

-50.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.61%

72.32%

-53.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.61%

72.32%

-53.71%

QQA vs. MSTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQA has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than MSTY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQA vs. MSTY - Dividend Comparison

QQA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.72%, less than MSTY's 289.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
MSTY
YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF
289.43%294.61%104.56%
QQA
Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF
9.72%9.78%4.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQA and MSTY have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSTY has higher volatility (23.76%) compared to QQA (6.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQA dropped -19.73% vs MSTY's -77.40%.

On 1-year performance, QQA leads with 24.09% vs -73.76% for MSTY. On fees, QQA is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, QQA has been the lower-risk option at 6.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QQA has performed better with a 24.09% return vs -73.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQA is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for MSTY.

MSTY has the higher dividend yield at 289.43%, compared with 9.72% for QQA.

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for QQA and 0.99% for MSTY.

QQA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs -1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQA and MSTY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer