PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMDW vs. MAGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMDW vs. MAGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW) and Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMDW achieves a 176.01% return, which is significantly higher than MAGX's -13.73% return.


AMDW

1D
-7.20%
1M
12.58%
YTD
176.01%
6M
174.69%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MAGX

1D
-2.86%
1M
-17.70%
YTD
-13.73%
6M
-16.51%
1Y
25.45%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMDW vs. MAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
AMDW
Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF
176.01%36.56%
MAGX
Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF
-13.73%27.91%

Correlation

The correlation between AMDW and MAGX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025

0.44

AMDW vs. MAGX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AMDW
MAGX

Technology

27.8%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

32.8%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

AMDW
27.8%
MAGX

-

Basic Materials

AMDW

-

MAGX

-

Communication Services

AMDW

-

MAGX

-

Consumer Cyclical

AMDW

-

MAGX

-

Consumer Defensive

AMDW

-

MAGX

-

Energy

AMDW

-

MAGX

-

Financial Services

AMDW

-

MAGX
32.8%

Healthcare

AMDW

-

MAGX

-

Industrials

AMDW

-

MAGX

-

Real Estate

AMDW

-

MAGX

-

Utilities

AMDW

-

MAGX

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMDW vs. MAGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMDW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


MAGX
MAGX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
MAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
MAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMDW vs. MAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW) and Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AMDWMAGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.03

AMDW vs. MAGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AMDW vs. MAGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMDW drawdown since its inception was -34.64%, smaller than the maximum MAGX drawdown of -54.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMDW and MAGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMDWMAGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.64%

-54.19%

+19.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.20%

-21.36%

+14.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.25%

-13.79%

-0.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.59%

Volatility

AMDW vs. MAGX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMDWMAGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

83.41%

41.71%

+41.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

83.41%

53.76%

+29.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

83.41%

53.76%

+29.65%

AMDW vs. MAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMDW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than MAGX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

AMDW vs. MAGX - Dividend Comparison

AMDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 37.14%, more than MAGX's 2.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
AMDW
Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF
37.14%34.78%0.00%
MAGX
Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF
2.37%2.05%0.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMDW and MAGX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MAGX is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MAGX is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AMDW.

AMDW has the higher dividend yield at 37.14%, compared with 2.37% for MAGX.

AMDW is categorized as Derivative Income, while MAGX is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for AMDW and 0.95% for MAGX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMDW and MAGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer