AMDL vs. BABX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL) and GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (BABX).

AMDL and BABX are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AMDL is an actively managed fund by GraniteShares. It was launched on Mar 15, 2024. BABX is an actively managed fund by GraniteShares. It was launched on Dec 12, 2022.

Performance

AMDL vs. BABX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL) and GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (BABX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

AMDL vs. BABX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
AMDL GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF	-21.48%	103.00%	-69.97%
BABX GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF	-31.52%	123.85%	15.83%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMDL achieves a -21.48% return, which is significantly higher than BABX's -31.52% return.

AMDL

• 1D: 7.48%
• 1M: -0.41%
• YTD: -21.48%
• 6M: 18.20%
• 1Y: 137.55%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BABX

• 1D: 5.70%
• 1M: -25.93%
• YTD: -31.52%
• 6M: -56.68%
• 1Y: -30.71%
• 3Y*: -5.38%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMDL vs. BABX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both AMDL and BABX have an expense ratio of 1.15%.

AMDL

GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF

BABX

GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF

Return for Risk

AMDL vs. BABX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMDL

AMDL Risk / Return Rank: 72
AMDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
AMDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
AMDL Omega Ratio Rank: 77
AMDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
AMDL Martin Ratio Rank: 52

BABX

BABX Risk / Return Rank: 7
BABX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
BABX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
BABX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
BABX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
BABX Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMDL vs. BABX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL) and GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (BABX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AMDL	BABX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.07	-0.33	+1.41
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.17	0.09	+2.08
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.01	+0.27
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.41	-0.49	+2.90
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.72	-0.98	+5.70
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AMDL vs. BABX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMDL Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is higher than the BABX Sharpe Ratio of -0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMDL and BABX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AMDL	BABX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.07	-0.33	+1.41
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.27	-0.02	-0.26

Correlation

The correlation between AMDL and BABX is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

AMDL vs. BABX - Dividend Comparison

Neither AMDL nor BABX has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

AMDL vs. BABX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMDL drawdown since its inception was -88.63%, which is greater than BABX's maximum drawdown of -70.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMDL and BABX.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMDL	BABX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-88.63%	-70.62%	-18.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-56.13%	-63.43%	+7.30%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-52.14%	-61.35%	+9.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-51.71%	-44.56%	-7.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	28.66%	31.47%	-2.81%

Volatility

AMDL vs. BABX - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL) has a higher volatility of 32.68% compared to GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (BABX) at 25.50%. This indicates that AMDL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BABX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AMDL	BABX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	32.68%	25.50%	+7.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	97.70%	58.87%	+38.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	129.18%	92.17%	+37.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	111.42%	82.96%	+28.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	111.42%	82.96%	+28.46%