AMBA vs. XOM
AMBA (Ambarella, Inc.) and XOM (Exxon Mobil Corporation) are both stocks. AMBA operates in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials (Technology), while XOM operates in Oil & Gas Integrated (Energy). Over the past 10 years, AMBA returned 3.49%/yr vs 8.48%/yr for XOM. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AMBA vs. XOM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMBA achieves a 9.12% return, which is significantly lower than XOM's 16.96% return. Over the past 10 years, AMBA has underperformed XOM with an annualized return of 3.49%, while XOM has yielded a comparatively higher 8.48% annualized return.
AMBA
- 1D
- -1.38%
- 1M
- 17.48%
- 6M
- 11.62%
- YTD
- 9.12%
- 1Y
- 15.58%
- 3Y*
- -1.42%
- 5Y*
- -5.30%
- 10Y*
- 3.49%
XOM
- 1D
- 1.03%
- 1M
- -5.27%
- 6M
- 12.96%
- YTD
- 16.96%
- 1Y
- 24.15%
- 3Y*
- 13.15%
- 5Y*
- 22.21%
- 10Y*
- 8.48%
AMBA vs. XOM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMBA Ambarella, Inc. | 9.12% | -2.61% | 18.68% | -25.47% | -59.47% | 120.96% | 51.62% | 73.13% | -40.46% | 8.54% |
XOM Exxon Mobil Corporation | 16.96% | 15.98% | 11.26% | -6.26% | 87.41% | 57.58% | -36.21% | 7.23% | -15.09% | -3.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMBA and XOM is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2012 | 0.19 |
The correlation between AMBA and XOM shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
AMBA:
$3.39B
XOM:
$575.42B
AMBA:
-$1.62
XOM:
$5.96
AMBA:
8.19
XOM:
1.81
AMBA:
5.56
XOM:
2.28
AMBA:
$405.19M
XOM:
$326.01B
AMBA:
$238.32M
XOM:
$83.11B
AMBA:
-$69.43M
XOM:
$60.44B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMBA vs. XOM — Risk / Return Rank
AMBA
XOM
AMBA vs. XOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ambarella, Inc. (AMBA) and Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AMBA | XOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.18 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.30 | 1.23 | -0.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.59 | 3.24 | -2.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AMBA vs. XOM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMBA drawdown since its inception was -81.65%, which is greater than XOM's maximum drawdown of -62.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMBA and XOM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMBA | XOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.65% | -62.40% | -19.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.06% | -20.11% | -28.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -52.74% | -20.11% | -32.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -81.65% | -20.51% | -61.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -81.65% | -61.34% | -20.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -64.35% | -18.46% | -45.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -48.51% | -10.22% | -38.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.62% | 7.65% | +16.97% |
Volatility
AMBA vs. XOM - Volatility Comparison
Ambarella, Inc. (AMBA) has a higher volatility of 35.14% compared to Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) at 7.89%. This indicates that AMBA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMBA | XOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 35.14% | 7.89% | +27.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 57.00% | 20.76% | +36.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 72.60% | 24.73% | +47.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 65.11% | 26.71% | +38.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 57.86% | 28.25% | +29.61% |
Dividends
AMBA vs. XOM - Dividend Comparison
AMBA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.94%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMBA Ambarella, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XOM Exxon Mobil Corporation | 2.94% | 3.32% | 3.57% | 3.68% | 3.22% | 5.70% | 8.44% | 4.92% | 4.74% | 3.66% | 3.30% | 3.69% |
Financials
AMBA vs. XOM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ambarella, Inc. and Exxon Mobil Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AMBA vs. XOM - Profitability Comparison
AMBA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Ambarella, Inc. reported a gross profit of 58.59M and revenue of 100.36M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.4%.
XOM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Exxon Mobil Corporation reported a gross profit of 31.36B and revenue of 83.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.7%.
AMBA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Ambarella, Inc. reported an operating income of -19.42M and revenue of 100.36M, resulting in an operating margin of -19.4%.
XOM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Exxon Mobil Corporation reported an operating income of 5.29B and revenue of 83.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.4%.
AMBA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Ambarella, Inc. reported a net income of -18.09M and revenue of 100.36M, resulting in a net margin of -18.0%.
XOM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Exxon Mobil Corporation reported a net income of 4.18B and revenue of 83.16B, resulting in a net margin of 5.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AMBA and XOM have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMBA has higher volatility (35.14%) compared to XOM (7.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMBA dropped -81.65% vs XOM's -62.40%.
XOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.00 vs 0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AMBA and XOM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer