AMBA vs. NTR
AMBA (Ambarella, Inc.) and NTR (Nutrien Ltd.) are both stocks. AMBA operates in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials (Technology), while NTR operates in Agricultural Inputs (Basic Materials). Over the past 5 years, AMBA returned -5.30%/yr vs 5.01%/yr for NTR. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AMBA vs. NTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMBA achieves a 9.12% return, which is significantly higher than NTR's 7.75% return.
AMBA
- 1D
- -1.38%
- 1M
- 17.48%
- 6M
- 11.62%
- YTD
- 9.12%
- 1Y
- 15.58%
- 3Y*
- -1.42%
- 5Y*
- -5.30%
- 10Y*
- 3.49%
NTR
- 1D
- 1.33%
- 1M
- 0.71%
- 6M
- 11.17%
- YTD
- 7.75%
- 1Y
- 11.02%
- 3Y*
- 6.86%
- 5Y*
- 5.01%
- 10Y*
- —
AMBA vs. NTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMBA Ambarella, Inc. | 9.12% | -2.61% | 18.68% | -25.47% | -59.47% | 120.96% | 51.62% | 73.13% | -40.46% |
NTR Nutrien Ltd. | 7.75% | 43.33% | -16.97% | -20.19% | 0.23% | 60.78% | 5.60% | 5.57% | -7.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMBA and NTR is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2018 | 0.25 |
Over the past year, the correlation between AMBA and NTR has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.25, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
AMBA:
$3.39B
NTR:
$31.41B
AMBA:
-$1.62
NTR:
$4.94
AMBA:
8.19
NTR:
1.14
AMBA:
5.56
NTR:
1.25
AMBA:
$405.19M
NTR:
$27.76B
AMBA:
$238.32M
NTR:
$8.66B
AMBA:
-$69.43M
NTR:
$6.33B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMBA vs. NTR — Risk / Return Rank
AMBA
NTR
AMBA vs. NTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ambarella, Inc. (AMBA) and Nutrien Ltd. (NTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AMBA | NTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.09 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.30 | 0.41 | -0.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.59 | 1.12 | -0.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AMBA vs. NTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMBA drawdown since its inception was -81.65%, which is greater than NTR's maximum drawdown of -57.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMBA and NTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMBA | NTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.65% | -57.80% | -23.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.06% | -27.56% | -21.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -52.74% | -32.82% | -19.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -81.65% | -57.80% | -23.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -81.65% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -64.35% | -32.96% | -31.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -48.51% | -26.25% | -22.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.62% | 10.14% | +14.48% |
Volatility
AMBA vs. NTR - Volatility Comparison
Ambarella, Inc. (AMBA) has a higher volatility of 35.14% compared to Nutrien Ltd. (NTR) at 8.92%. This indicates that AMBA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMBA | NTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 35.14% | 8.92% | +26.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 57.00% | 25.80% | +31.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 72.60% | 32.15% | +40.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 65.11% | 34.17% | +30.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 57.86% | 33.95% | +23.91% |
Dividends
AMBA vs. NTR - Dividend Comparison
AMBA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.35%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMBA Ambarella, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NTR Nutrien Ltd. | 3.35% | 3.53% | 4.83% | 3.76% | 3.51% | 2.45% | 3.74% | 3.67% | 3.47% |
Financials
AMBA vs. NTR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ambarella, Inc. and Nutrien Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AMBA vs. NTR - Profitability Comparison
AMBA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Ambarella, Inc. reported a gross profit of 58.59M and revenue of 100.36M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.4%.
NTR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Nutrien Ltd. reported a gross profit of 1.62B and revenue of 5.96B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.2%.
AMBA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Ambarella, Inc. reported an operating income of -19.42M and revenue of 100.36M, resulting in an operating margin of -19.4%.
NTR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Nutrien Ltd. reported an operating income of 419.11M and revenue of 5.96B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.0%.
AMBA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Ambarella, Inc. reported a net income of -18.09M and revenue of 100.36M, resulting in a net margin of -18.0%.
NTR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Nutrien Ltd. reported a net income of 129.19M and revenue of 5.96B, resulting in a net margin of 2.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AMBA and NTR have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMBA has higher volatility (35.14%) compared to NTR (8.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMBA dropped -81.65% vs NTR's -57.80%.
NTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.36 vs 0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AMBA and NTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer