PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMBA vs. HGER
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMBA vs. HGER - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ambarella, Inc. (AMBA) and Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF (HGER). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMBA achieves a 4.18% return, which is significantly lower than HGER's 28.12% return.


AMBA

1D
-5.84%
1M
4.36%
YTD
4.18%
6M
5.26%
1Y
37.00%
3Y*
-1.21%
5Y*
-5.58%
10Y*
4.73%

HGER

1D
-0.28%
1M
-2.72%
YTD
28.12%
6M
27.93%
1Y
41.90%
3Y*
21.26%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMBA vs. HGER - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
AMBA
Ambarella, Inc.
4.18%-2.61%18.68%-25.47%-44.64%
HGER
Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF
28.12%20.08%9.25%1.93%9.77%

Correlation

The correlation between AMBA and HGER is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2022

0.12

The correlation between AMBA and HGER shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (1 year) to 0.12 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMBA vs. HGER — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMBA
AMBA Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
AMBA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMBA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMBA Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
AMBA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMBA Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

HGER
HGER Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
HGER Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HGER Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
HGER Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
HGER Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
HGER Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMBA vs. HGER - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ambarella, Inc. (AMBA) and Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF (HGER). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMBAHGERDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.46

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.76

5.20

-4.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.60

17.52

-15.91

AMBA vs. HGER - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMBA Sharpe Ratio is 0.57, which is lower than the HGER Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMBA and HGER, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMBAHGERDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

2.50

-1.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.90

-0.55

Drawdowns

AMBA vs. HGER - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMBA drawdown since its inception was -81.65%, which is greater than HGER's maximum drawdown of -23.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMBA and HGER.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMBAHGERDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.65%

-23.31%

-58.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-49.06%

-8.09%

-40.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-54.85%

-8.84%

-46.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-81.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-81.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-65.97%

-4.99%

-60.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-48.36%

-7.66%

-40.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.14%

2.40%

+20.74%

Volatility

AMBA vs. HGER - Volatility Comparison

Ambarella, Inc. (AMBA) has a higher volatility of 30.62% compared to Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF (HGER) at 4.02%. This indicates that AMBA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HGER based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMBAHGERDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

30.62%

4.02%

+26.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.31%

14.54%

+31.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

65.53%

16.87%

+48.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

62.82%

17.62%

+45.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

56.62%

17.62%

+39.00%

Dividends

AMBA vs. HGER - Dividend Comparison

AMBA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HGER's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.53%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
AMBA
Ambarella, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HGER
Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF
5.53%7.09%3.28%7.24%0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMBA and HGER have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMBA has higher volatility (30.62%) compared to HGER (4.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMBA dropped -81.65% vs HGER's -23.31%.

HGER currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMBA and HGER

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer