AMAX vs. AUMI

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF (AMAX) and Themes Gold Miners ETF (AUMI).

AMAX and AUMI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AMAX is an actively managed fund by Adaptive. It was launched on Oct 2, 2009. AUMI is a passively managed fund by Themes that tracks the performance of the Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners Index. It was launched on Dec 12, 2023.

Performance

AMAX vs. AUMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF (AMAX) and Themes Gold Miners ETF (AUMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

AMAX vs. AUMI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
AMAX RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF	0.90%	11.38%	9.62%	1.52%
AUMI Themes Gold Miners ETF	10.53%	164.18%	30.61%	4.25%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMAX achieves a 0.90% return, which is significantly lower than AUMI's 10.53% return.

AMAX

• 1D: 0.72%
• 1M: -4.72%
• YTD: 0.90%
• 6M: -0.88%
• 1Y: 14.84%
• 3Y*: 8.46%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AUMI

• 1D: 5.17%
• 1M: -16.46%
• YTD: 10.53%
• 6M: 26.21%
• 1Y: 116.15%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMAX vs. AUMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMAX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than AUMI's 0.35% expense ratio.

AMAX

RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF

AUMI

Themes Gold Miners ETF

Return for Risk

AMAX vs. AUMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMAX

AMAX Risk / Return Rank: 68
AMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
AMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
AMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 63
AMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
AMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 62

AUMI

AUMI Risk / Return Rank: 91
AUMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
AUMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
AUMI Omega Ratio Rank: 87
AUMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
AUMI Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMAX vs. AUMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF (AMAX) and Themes Gold Miners ETF (AUMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AMAX	AUMI	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.32	2.35	-1.03
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.81	2.57	-0.76
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.36	-0.12
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.08	3.66	-1.59
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.57	12.93	-6.36
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AMAX vs. AUMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is lower than the AUMI Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMAX and AUMI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AMAX	AUMI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.32	2.35	-1.03
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.31	2.01	-1.70

Correlation

The correlation between AMAX and AUMI is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

AMAX vs. AUMI - Dividend Comparison

AMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.50%, more than AUMI's 0.78% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
AMAX RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF	10.50%	9.18%	7.36%	6.99%	11.22%	1.00%
AUMI Themes Gold Miners ETF	0.78%	0.86%	1.84%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

AMAX vs. AUMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMAX drawdown since its inception was -16.28%, smaller than the maximum AUMI drawdown of -31.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMAX and AUMI.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMAX	AUMI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.28%	-31.88%	+15.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.53%	-31.88%	+24.35%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.39%	-16.84%	+11.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.44%	-6.00%	+0.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.38%	9.03%	-6.65%

Volatility

AMAX vs. AUMI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF (AMAX) is 3.97%, while Themes Gold Miners ETF (AUMI) has a volatility of 18.77%. This indicates that AMAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AUMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AMAX	AUMI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.97%	18.77%	-14.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.16%	40.65%	-32.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.31%	49.65%	-38.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.38%	41.38%	-31.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.38%	41.38%	-31.00%