AMAX vs. VOO
AMAX (RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AMAX is a Nontraditional Bonds fund actively managed by Adaptive, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. AMAX is actively managed, while VOO is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, AMAX returned 9.23%/yr vs 22.73%/yr for VOO. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AMAX charges 1.29%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.
Performance
AMAX vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMAX achieves a 4.98% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 11.69% return.
AMAX
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 4.98%
- 6M
- 3.96%
- 1Y
- 12.42%
- 3Y*
- 9.23%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VOO
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 5.39%
- YTD
- 11.69%
- 6M
- 12.11%
- 1Y
- 29.68%
- 3Y*
- 22.73%
- 5Y*
- 14.26%
- 10Y*
- 15.65%
AMAX vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMAX RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF | 4.98% | 11.38% | 9.62% | 6.70% | -12.56% | -0.20% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 11.69% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 1.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMAX and VOO is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2021 | 0.57 |
The correlation between AMAX and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.
AMAX vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AMAX
VOO
Technology
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
AMAX
VOO
Basic Materials
AMAX
VOO
Communication Services
AMAX
VOO
Financial Services
AMAX
VOO
Consumer Cyclical
AMAX
VOO
Healthcare
AMAX
VOO
Industrials
AMAX
VOO
Consumer Defensive
AMAX
VOO
Energy
AMAX
VOO
Utilities
AMAX
VOO
Real Estate
AMAX
VOO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMAX vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
AMAX
VOO
AMAX vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF (AMAX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AMAX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.26 | 2.53 | -1.27 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.76 | 3.43 | -1.67 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.46 | -0.24 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.79 | 3.42 | -1.63 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.33 | 15.95 | -10.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMAX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.26 | 2.53 | -1.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.89 | -0.50 |
Drawdowns
AMAX vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMAX drawdown since its inception was -16.28%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMAX and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMAX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.28% | -33.99% | +17.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.53% | -8.90% | +1.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.27% | -18.69% | +9.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.52% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.80% | 0.00% | -1.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.32% | -3.69% | -1.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.53% | 1.91% | +0.62% |
Volatility
AMAX vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF (AMAX) is 2.32%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 2.74%. This indicates that AMAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMAX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.32% | 2.74% | -0.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.02% | 8.88% | -0.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.95% | 11.78% | -1.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.36% | 16.81% | -6.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.36% | 18.01% | -7.65% |
AMAX vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMAX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMAX vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
AMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.94%, more than VOO's 1.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMAX RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF | 10.94% | 9.18% | 7.36% | 6.99% | 11.22% | 1.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.02% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMAX and VOO have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VOO has higher volatility (2.74%) compared to AMAX (2.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMAX dropped -16.28% vs VOO's -33.99%.
On 3-year performance, VOO leads with 22.73% vs 9.23% for AMAX. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, AMAX has been the lower-risk option at 2.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, VOO has performed better with a 22.73% return vs 9.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for AMAX.
AMAX has the higher dividend yield at 10.94%, compared with 1.02% for VOO.
AMAX is categorized as Nontraditional Bonds, while VOO is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Adaptive and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for AMAX and 0.03% for VOO.
VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AMAX and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer