PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMAX vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMAX vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF (AMAX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMAX achieves a 4.98% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 11.69% return.


AMAX

1D
-0.13%
1M
0.30%
YTD
4.98%
6M
3.96%
1Y
12.42%
3Y*
9.23%
5Y*
10Y*

VOO

1D
0.14%
1M
5.39%
YTD
11.69%
6M
12.11%
1Y
29.68%
3Y*
22.73%
5Y*
14.26%
10Y*
15.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMAX vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
AMAX
RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF
4.98%11.38%9.62%6.70%-12.56%-0.20%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
11.69%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%1.95%

Correlation

The correlation between AMAX and VOO is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2021

0.57

The correlation between AMAX and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

AMAX vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AMAX
VOO

Technology

48.2%
35.7%

Basic Materials

16.4%
1.8%

Communication Services

7.7%
11.3%

Financial Services

6.8%
11.6%

Consumer Cyclical

5.8%
10.2%

Healthcare

4.7%
8.5%

Industrials

4.6%
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

2.3%
4.9%

Energy

1.6%
3.5%

Utilities

1.1%
2.4%

Real Estate

0.9%
1.9%

Technology

AMAX
48.2%
VOO
35.7%

Basic Materials

AMAX
16.4%
VOO
1.8%

Communication Services

AMAX
7.7%
VOO
11.3%

Financial Services

AMAX
6.8%
VOO
11.6%

Consumer Cyclical

AMAX
5.8%
VOO
10.2%

Healthcare

AMAX
4.7%
VOO
8.5%

Industrials

AMAX
4.6%
VOO
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

AMAX
2.3%
VOO
4.9%

Energy

AMAX
1.6%
VOO
3.5%

Utilities

AMAX
1.1%
VOO
2.4%

Real Estate

AMAX
0.9%
VOO
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMAX vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMAX
AMAX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
AMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
AMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMAX vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF (AMAX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMAXVOODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.26

2.53

-1.27

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.76

3.43

-1.67

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.46

-0.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.79

3.42

-1.63

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.33

15.95

-10.62

AMAX vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMAX and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMAXVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.26

2.53

-1.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.89

-0.50

Drawdowns

AMAX vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMAX drawdown since its inception was -16.28%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMAX and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMAXVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.28%

-33.99%

+17.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.53%

-8.90%

+1.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.27%

-18.69%

+9.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.80%

0.00%

-1.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.32%

-3.69%

-1.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.53%

1.91%

+0.62%

Volatility

AMAX vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF (AMAX) is 2.32%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 2.74%. This indicates that AMAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMAXVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.32%

2.74%

-0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.02%

8.88%

-0.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.95%

11.78%

-1.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.36%

16.81%

-6.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.36%

18.01%

-7.65%

AMAX vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMAX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

AMAX vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

AMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.94%, more than VOO's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMAX
RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF
10.94%9.18%7.36%6.99%11.22%1.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.02%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMAX and VOO have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VOO has higher volatility (2.74%) compared to AMAX (2.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMAX dropped -16.28% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 3-year performance, VOO leads with 22.73% vs 9.23% for AMAX. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, AMAX has been the lower-risk option at 2.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, VOO has performed better with a 22.73% return vs 9.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for AMAX.

AMAX has the higher dividend yield at 10.94%, compared with 1.02% for VOO.

AMAX is categorized as Nontraditional Bonds, while VOO is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Adaptive and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for AMAX and 0.03% for VOO.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMAX and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer