PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
AMAX vs. QDTE
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between AMAX and QDTE is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.6

Performance

AMAX vs. QDTE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF (AMAX) and Roundhill ETF Trust - Roundhill N-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
0.62%
11.16%
AMAX
QDTE

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

AMAX:

9.65%

QDTE:

16.92%

Max Drawdown

AMAX:

-16.26%

QDTE:

-10.74%

Current Drawdown

AMAX:

-1.26%

QDTE:

-2.26%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMAX achieves a 1.70% return, which is significantly lower than QDTE's 3.58% return.


AMAX

YTD

1.70%

1M

-1.03%

6M

0.62%

1Y

8.63%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

QDTE

YTD

3.58%

1M

-1.37%

6M

11.15%

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AMAX vs. QDTE - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMAX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than QDTE's 0.95% expense ratio.


AMAX
RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF
Expense ratio chart for AMAX: current value at 1.29% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%1.29%
Expense ratio chart for QDTE: current value at 0.95% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.95%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

AMAX vs. QDTE — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMAX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AMAX is 4545
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AMAX is 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AMAX is 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AMAX is 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AMAX is 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AMAX is 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

QDTE
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

AMAX vs. QDTE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF (AMAX) and Roundhill ETF Trust - Roundhill N-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for AMAX, currently valued at 0.97, compared to the broader market0.002.004.000.97
The chart of Sortino ratio for AMAX, currently valued at 1.39, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.001.39
The chart of Omega ratio for AMAX, currently valued at 1.18, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.18
The chart of Calmar ratio for AMAX, currently valued at 1.63, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.001.63
The chart of Martin ratio for AMAX, currently valued at 6.21, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.006.21
AMAX
QDTE


Chart placeholderNot enough data

Dividends

AMAX vs. QDTE - Dividend Comparison

AMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.83%, less than QDTE's 37.57% yield.


TTM2024202320222021
AMAX
RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF
7.83%7.38%7.05%11.26%1.00%
QDTE
Roundhill ETF Trust - Roundhill N-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
37.57%32.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

AMAX vs. QDTE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMAX drawdown since its inception was -16.26%, which is greater than QDTE's maximum drawdown of -10.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMAX and QDTE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-7.00%-6.00%-5.00%-4.00%-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-1.26%
-2.26%
AMAX
QDTE

Volatility

AMAX vs. QDTE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF (AMAX) is 3.79%, while Roundhill ETF Trust - Roundhill N-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE) has a volatility of 4.55%. This indicates that AMAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QDTE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
3.79%
4.55%
AMAX
QDTE
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab