AMAX vs. QDTE

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

AMAX (RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF) and QDTE (Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AMAX is a Nontraditional Bonds fund actively managed by Adaptive, while QDTE is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AMAX returned 5.50% vs 25.08% for QDTE. Their 0.54 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. AMAX charges 1.29%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for QDTE.

Performance

AMAX vs. QDTE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF (AMAX) and Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMAX achieves a 0.60% return, which is significantly lower than QDTE's 10.53% return.

AMAX

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: -0.21%
• 6M: -2.44%
• YTD: 0.60%
• 1Y: 5.50%
• 3Y*: 7.50%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 2.90%

QDTE

• 1D: 0.81%
• 1M: -1.54%
• 6M: 8.89%
• YTD: 10.53%
• 1Y: 25.08%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 19.88%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AMAX RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF	$319.31K	$260.04K	$341.45K
QDTE Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF	$17.47M	$18.74M	$19.73M

AMAX vs. QDTE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
AMAX RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF	0.60%	11.38%	4.63%
QDTE Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF	10.53%	19.32%	17.13%

Correlation

The correlation between AMAX and QDTE is 0.53, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.53
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2024	0.54

The correlation between AMAX and QDTE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

AMAX vs. QDTE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AMAX

AMAX Risk / Return Rank: 21
AMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
AMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
AMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 20
AMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
AMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 22

QDTE

QDTE Risk / Return Rank: 56
QDTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
QDTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
QDTE Omega Ratio Rank: 50
QDTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
QDTE Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AMAX vs. QDTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF (AMAX) and Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AMAX	QDTE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.47	1.26	-0.78
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.70	1.72	-1.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.22	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.67	2.23	-1.55
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.51	7.58	-6.07

AMAX vs. QDTE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.47, which is lower than the QDTE Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMAX and QDTE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AMAX vs. QDTE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMAX drawdown since its inception was -16.28%, smaller than the maximum QDTE drawdown of -22.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMAX and QDTE.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMAX	QDTE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.28%	-22.86%	+6.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.53%	-10.20%	+2.67%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.27%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.89%	-5.34%	-0.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.32%	-3.17%	-2.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.34%	2.99%	+0.35%

Volatility

AMAX vs. QDTE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF (AMAX) is 2.40%, while Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE) has a volatility of 6.78%. This indicates that AMAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QDTE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AMAX	QDTE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.40%	6.78%	-4.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.85%	14.80%	-5.95%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.70%	18.06%	-7.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.43%	19.17%	-8.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.43%	19.17%	-8.74%

AMAX vs. QDTE - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMAX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than QDTE's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

AMAX vs. QDTE - Dividend Comparison

AMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.89%, less than QDTE's 46.41% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
AMAX RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF	11.89%	9.18%	7.36%	6.99%	11.22%	1.00%
QDTE Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF	46.41%	49.49%	32.09%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMAX and QDTE in my portfolio?

AMAX and QDTE have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AMAX or QDTE?

QDTE has higher volatility (6.78%) compared to AMAX (2.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMAX dropped -16.28% vs QDTE's -22.86%.

Which ETF is better, AMAX or QDTE?

On 1-year performance, QDTE leads with 25.08% vs 5.50% for AMAX. On fees, QDTE is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, AMAX has been the lower-risk option at 2.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AMAX or QDTE?

Over the 1-year period, QDTE has performed better with a 25.08% return vs 5.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AMAX or QDTE?

QDTE is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for AMAX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AMAX or QDTE?

QDTE has the higher dividend yield at 46.41%, compared with 11.89% for AMAX.

What is the main difference between AMAX and QDTE?

AMAX is categorized as Nontraditional Bonds, while QDTE is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Adaptive and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for AMAX and 0.95% for QDTE.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QDTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.26 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.