PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
AMAX vs. PHYS.TO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between AMAX and PHYS.TO is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.4

Performance

AMAX vs. PHYS.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF (AMAX) and Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
4.74%
52.33%
AMAX
PHYS.TO

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

AMAX:

1.12

PHYS.TO:

3.59

Sortino Ratio

AMAX:

1.59

PHYS.TO:

4.34

Omega Ratio

AMAX:

1.20

PHYS.TO:

1.62

Calmar Ratio

AMAX:

1.88

PHYS.TO:

6.30

Martin Ratio

AMAX:

7.18

PHYS.TO:

19.75

Ulcer Index

AMAX:

1.50%

PHYS.TO:

2.65%

Daily Std Dev

AMAX:

9.60%

PHYS.TO:

14.57%

Max Drawdown

AMAX:

-16.26%

PHYS.TO:

-27.08%

Current Drawdown

AMAX:

-0.44%

PHYS.TO:

-1.71%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMAX achieves a 2.48% return, which is significantly lower than PHYS.TO's 9.32% return.


AMAX

YTD

2.48%

1M

2.68%

6M

2.39%

1Y

9.88%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

PHYS.TO

YTD

9.32%

1M

4.97%

6M

19.23%

1Y

51.65%

5Y*

13.20%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

AMAX vs. PHYS.TO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMAX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AMAX is 4848
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AMAX is 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AMAX is 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AMAX is 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AMAX is 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AMAX is 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

PHYS.TO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PHYS.TO is 9797
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PHYS.TO is 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PHYS.TO is 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PHYS.TO is 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PHYS.TO is 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PHYS.TO is 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

AMAX vs. PHYS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF (AMAX) and Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for AMAX, currently valued at 0.99, compared to the broader market0.002.004.000.992.76
The chart of Sortino ratio for AMAX, currently valued at 1.42, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.001.423.39
The chart of Omega ratio for AMAX, currently valued at 1.18, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.181.48
The chart of Calmar ratio for AMAX, currently valued at 1.65, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.001.654.63
The chart of Martin ratio for AMAX, currently valued at 6.22, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.006.2213.05
AMAX
PHYS.TO

The current AMAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is lower than the PHYS.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMAX and PHYS.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
0.99
2.76
AMAX
PHYS.TO

Dividends

AMAX vs. PHYS.TO - Dividend Comparison

AMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.77%, while PHYS.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2024202320222021
AMAX
RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF
7.77%7.38%7.05%11.26%1.00%
PHYS.TO
Sprott Physical Gold Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

AMAX vs. PHYS.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMAX drawdown since its inception was -16.26%, smaller than the maximum PHYS.TO drawdown of -27.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMAX and PHYS.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-0.44%
-1.66%
AMAX
PHYS.TO

Volatility

AMAX vs. PHYS.TO - Volatility Comparison

RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF (AMAX) and Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS.TO) have volatilities of 4.34% and 4.20%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
4.34%
4.20%
AMAX
PHYS.TO
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab