AM vs. VGT
AM (Antero Midstream Corporation) is a stock, while VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) is Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. Over the past 10 years, AM returned 7.09%/yr vs 24.44%/yr for VGT. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AM vs. VGT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AM achieves a 31.35% return, which is significantly higher than VGT's 21.52% return. Over the past 10 years, AM has underperformed VGT with an annualized return of 7.09%, while VGT has yielded a comparatively higher 24.44% annualized return.
AM
- 1D
- 1.92%
- 1M
- 6.53%
- 6M
- 30.99%
- YTD
- 31.35%
- 1Y
- 36.52%
- 3Y*
- 32.77%
- 5Y*
- 27.39%
- 10Y*
- 7.09%
VGT
- 1D
- -1.94%
- 1M
- -2.91%
- 6M
- 20.62%
- YTD
- 21.52%
- 1Y
- 35.18%
- 3Y*
- 26.94%
- 5Y*
- 18.62%
- 10Y*
- 24.44%
AM vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AM Antero Midstream Corporation | 31.35% | 24.37% | 28.46% | 25.73% | 21.98% | 39.55% | 27.59% | -60.29% | -22.28% | -2.32% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 21.52% | 21.77% | 29.30% | 52.66% | -29.70% | 30.45% | 46.04% | 48.62% | 2.46% | 37.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between AM and VGT is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2014 | 0.25 |
The correlation between AM and VGT shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.30 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AM vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank
AM
VGT
AM vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Antero Midstream Corporation (AM) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AM | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.26 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.90 | 2.16 | +0.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.12 | 6.19 | -0.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AM vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AM drawdown since its inception was -93.01%, which is greater than VGT's maximum drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AM and VGT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AM | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.01% | -54.63% | -38.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.67% | -16.40% | +3.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.98% | -27.23% | +13.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.91% | -35.07% | +13.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -93.01% | -35.07% | -57.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.17% | -9.06% | +6.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.67% | -7.94% | -23.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.99% | 5.70% | +0.29% |
Volatility
AM vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Antero Midstream Corporation (AM) is 6.50%, while Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a volatility of 8.66%. This indicates that AM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AM | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.50% | 8.66% | -2.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.65% | 19.53% | -4.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.77% | 23.44% | -2.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.35% | 25.70% | +0.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.88% | 24.81% | +17.07% |
Dividends
AM vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison
AM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.94%, more than VGT's 0.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AM Antero Midstream Corporation | 3.94% | 5.06% | 5.96% | 7.18% | 8.34% | 10.15% | 15.95% | 18.28% | 7.53% | 4.27% | 3.14% | 2.93% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 0.38% | 0.40% | 0.60% | 0.65% | 0.91% | 0.64% | 0.82% | 1.11% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.31% | 1.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AM and VGT have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VGT has higher volatility (8.66%) compared to AM (6.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AM dropped -93.01% vs VGT's -54.63%.
AM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AM and VGT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer