PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AM vs. NAD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AM vs. NAD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Antero Midstream Corporation (AM) and Nuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund (NAD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AM achieves a 22.62% return, which is significantly higher than NAD's 0.07% return. Over the past 10 years, AM has outperformed NAD with an annualized return of 7.20%, while NAD has yielded a comparatively lower 2.62% annualized return.


AM

1D
-0.88%
1M
1.96%
YTD
22.62%
6M
16.77%
1Y
19.29%
3Y*
32.87%
5Y*
24.10%
10Y*
7.20%

NAD

1D
-0.51%
1M
-1.67%
YTD
0.07%
6M
-0.34%
1Y
12.30%
3Y*
8.43%
5Y*
-0.34%
10Y*
2.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AM vs. NAD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AM
Antero Midstream Corporation
22.62%24.37%28.46%25.73%21.98%39.55%27.59%-60.29%-22.28%-2.32%
NAD
Nuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund
0.07%11.29%8.74%1.26%-22.85%9.70%10.33%21.92%-6.10%6.37%

Correlation

The correlation between AM and NAD is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2014

0.06

The correlation between AM and NAD shifts across timeframes, from 0.00 (1 year) to 0.13 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AM:

$10.19B

NAD:

$2.73B

EPS

AM:

$0.85

NAD:

$2.47

PE Ratio

AM:

24.99

NAD:

4.73

PEG Ratio

AM:

4.31

NAD:

0.02

PS Ratio

AM:

8.12

NAD:

6.64

PB Ratio

AM:

5.26

NAD:

0.95

Total Revenue (TTM)

AM:

$1.26B

NAD:

$410.48M

Gross Profit (TTM)

AM:

$620.66M

NAD:

$385.55M

EBITDA (TTM)

AM:

$955.64M

NAD:

$744.52M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AM vs. NAD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AM
AM Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
AM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
AM Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
AM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
AM Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

NAD
NAD Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
NAD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NAD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
NAD Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
NAD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
NAD Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AM vs. NAD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Antero Midstream Corporation (AM) and Nuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund (NAD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMNADDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.23

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.53

1.53

0.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.18

6.03

-2.84

AM vs. NAD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AM Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is comparable to the NAD Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AM and NAD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMNADDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

1.14

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

-0.03

+0.94

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

0.22

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.13

0.38

-0.24

Drawdowns

AM vs. NAD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AM drawdown since its inception was -93.01%, which is greater than NAD's maximum drawdown of -44.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AM and NAD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMNADDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.01%

-44.65%

-48.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.67%

-8.08%

-4.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.98%

-14.69%

+0.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.91%

-35.58%

+13.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-93.01%

-35.58%

-57.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.68%

-5.89%

-2.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.42%

-7.82%

-23.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.10%

2.05%

+4.05%

Volatility

AM vs. NAD - Volatility Comparison

Antero Midstream Corporation (AM) has a higher volatility of 5.87% compared to Nuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund (NAD) at 3.22%. This indicates that AM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NAD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMNADDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.87%

3.22%

+2.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.39%

9.26%

+5.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.88%

10.88%

+10.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.55%

11.61%

+14.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.01%

11.93%

+30.08%

Dividends

AM vs. NAD - Dividend Comparison

AM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.22%, less than NAD's 7.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AM
Antero Midstream Corporation
4.22%5.06%5.96%7.18%8.34%10.15%15.95%18.28%7.53%4.27%3.14%2.93%
NAD
Nuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund
7.37%7.37%6.63%4.13%5.58%4.43%4.41%4.40%5.37%5.42%6.05%5.96%

Financials

AM vs. NAD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Antero Midstream Corporation and Nuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M300.00M350.00M20222023202420252026
314.21M
148.14M
(AM) Total Revenue
(NAD) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


AM and NAD have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AM has higher volatility (5.87%) compared to NAD (3.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AM dropped -93.01% vs NAD's -44.65%.

NAD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.14 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AM and NAD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer