PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
NAD vs. BAB
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between NAD and BAB is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.3

Performance

NAD vs. BAB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund (NAD) and Invesco Taxable Municipal Bond ETF (BAB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

95.00%100.00%105.00%110.00%115.00%120.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
107.10%
100.48%
NAD
BAB

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

NAD:

0.97

BAB:

0.80

Sortino Ratio

NAD:

1.34

BAB:

1.19

Omega Ratio

NAD:

1.18

BAB:

1.14

Calmar Ratio

NAD:

0.39

BAB:

0.34

Martin Ratio

NAD:

3.50

BAB:

2.01

Ulcer Index

NAD:

2.81%

BAB:

2.85%

Daily Std Dev

NAD:

10.16%

BAB:

7.15%

Max Drawdown

NAD:

-44.87%

BAB:

-27.80%

Current Drawdown

NAD:

-17.06%

BAB:

-11.73%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NAD achieves a -1.84% return, which is significantly lower than BAB's 1.43% return. Over the past 10 years, NAD has outperformed BAB with an annualized return of 2.83%, while BAB has yielded a comparatively lower 2.33% annualized return.


NAD

YTD

-1.84%

1M

-2.80%

6M

-6.00%

1Y

9.62%

5Y*

0.99%

10Y*

2.83%

BAB

YTD

1.43%

1M

-1.75%

6M

-1.10%

1Y

5.32%

5Y*

-0.47%

10Y*

2.33%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

NAD vs. BAB — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NAD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NAD is 7878
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NAD is 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NAD is 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NAD is 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NAD is 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NAD is 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

BAB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BAB is 7171
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BAB is 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BAB is 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BAB is 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BAB is 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BAB is 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

NAD vs. BAB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund (NAD) and Invesco Taxable Municipal Bond ETF (BAB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for NAD, currently valued at 0.97, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.00
NAD: 0.97
BAB: 0.80
The chart of Sortino ratio for NAD, currently valued at 1.34, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.00
NAD: 1.34
BAB: 1.19
The chart of Omega ratio for NAD, currently valued at 1.18, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
NAD: 1.18
BAB: 1.14
The chart of Calmar ratio for NAD, currently valued at 0.39, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.00
NAD: 0.39
BAB: 0.34
The chart of Martin ratio for NAD, currently valued at 3.50, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.00
NAD: 3.50
BAB: 2.01

The current NAD Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is comparable to the BAB Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NAD and BAB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
0.97
0.80
NAD
BAB

Dividends

NAD vs. BAB - Dividend Comparison

NAD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.91%, more than BAB's 4.02% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
NAD
Nuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund
7.91%6.63%4.13%5.58%4.43%4.41%4.40%5.37%5.42%6.05%5.96%6.20%
BAB
Invesco Taxable Municipal Bond ETF
4.02%3.97%3.65%3.40%2.63%2.96%3.77%4.20%3.96%4.26%4.71%4.59%

Drawdowns

NAD vs. BAB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NAD drawdown since its inception was -44.87%, which is greater than BAB's maximum drawdown of -27.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NAD and BAB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-18.00%-16.00%-14.00%-12.00%-10.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-17.06%
-11.73%
NAD
BAB

Volatility

NAD vs. BAB - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund (NAD) has a higher volatility of 6.43% compared to Invesco Taxable Municipal Bond ETF (BAB) at 2.93%. This indicates that NAD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
6.43%
2.93%
NAD
BAB
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab