PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ALLT vs. ATEN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ALLT vs. ATEN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allot Communications Ltd (ALLT) and A10 Networks, Inc. (ATEN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALLT achieves a -28.69% return, which is significantly lower than ATEN's 91.87% return. Over the past 10 years, ALLT has underperformed ATEN with an annualized return of 3.71%, while ATEN has yielded a comparatively higher 19.03% annualized return.


ALLT

1D
-2.37%
1M
-8.96%
YTD
-28.69%
6M
-25.66%
1Y
-22.28%
3Y*
30.21%
5Y*
-18.19%
10Y*
3.71%

ATEN

1D
1.53%
1M
15.81%
YTD
91.87%
6M
87.22%
1Y
92.22%
3Y*
34.44%
5Y*
27.05%
10Y*
19.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ALLT vs. ATEN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ALLT
Allot Communications Ltd
-28.69%65.21%260.61%-52.03%-71.04%12.93%23.76%40.03%13.88%11.27%
ATEN
A10 Networks, Inc.
91.87%-2.59%42.08%-19.43%1.70%68.66%43.52%10.10%-19.17%-7.10%

Correlation

The correlation between ALLT and ATEN is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2014

0.27

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ALLT:

$349.75M

ATEN:

$2.46B

EPS

ALLT:

$0.13

ATEN:

$0.61

PE Ratio

ALLT:

53.68

ATEN:

55.20

PS Ratio

ALLT:

3.05

ATEN:

8.23

PB Ratio

ALLT:

3.03

ATEN:

11.15

Total Revenue (TTM)

ALLT:

$105.27M

ATEN:

$299.42M

Gross Profit (TTM)

ALLT:

$74.41M

ATEN:

$237.54M

EBITDA (TTM)

ALLT:

$10.81M

ATEN:

$67.78M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ALLT vs. ATEN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALLT
ALLT Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
ALLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALLT Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
ALLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALLT Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

ATEN
ATEN Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
ATEN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATEN Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATEN Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
ATEN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATEN Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALLT vs. ATEN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allot Communications Ltd (ALLT) and A10 Networks, Inc. (ATEN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ALLTATENDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.44

-0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.49

5.37

-5.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.88

10.19

-11.06

ALLT vs. ATEN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALLT Sharpe Ratio is -0.34, which is lower than the ATEN Sharpe Ratio of 2.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALLT and ATEN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ALLT vs. ATEN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALLT drawdown since its inception was -95.42%, which is greater than ATEN's maximum drawdown of -78.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALLT and ATEN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ALLTATENDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.42%

-78.29%

-17.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-45.65%

-17.26%

-28.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-59.72%

-32.14%

-27.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-93.58%

-43.87%

-49.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-93.72%

-67.32%

-26.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-74.99%

0.00%

-74.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-65.06%

-40.11%

-24.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.40%

9.09%

+16.31%

Volatility

ALLT vs. ATEN - Volatility Comparison

Allot Communications Ltd (ALLT) has a higher volatility of 15.26% compared to A10 Networks, Inc. (ATEN) at 10.72%. This indicates that ALLT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ATEN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ALLTATENDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.26%

10.72%

+4.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

52.00%

25.27%

+26.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

65.47%

32.55%

+32.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

60.70%

42.36%

+18.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.32%

43.14%

+9.18%

Dividends

ALLT vs. ATEN - Dividend Comparison

ALLT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ATEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
ALLT
Allot Communications Ltd
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ATEN
A10 Networks, Inc.
0.71%1.36%1.30%1.82%1.26%0.30%

Financials

ALLT vs. ATEN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Allot Communications Ltd and A10 Networks, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


20.00M30.00M40.00M50.00M60.00M70.00M80.00M20222023202420252026
26.43M
75.00M
(ALLT) Total Revenue
(ATEN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ALLT vs. ATEN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Allot Communications Ltd and A10 Networks, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
70.9%
79.6%
Portfolio components
ALLT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Allot Communications Ltd reported a gross profit of 18.74M and revenue of 26.43M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 70.9%.

ATEN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, A10 Networks, Inc. reported a gross profit of 59.72M and revenue of 75.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.6%.

ALLT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Allot Communications Ltd reported an operating income of 1.53M and revenue of 26.43M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.8%.

ATEN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, A10 Networks, Inc. reported an operating income of 13.00M and revenue of 75.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.3%.

ALLT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Allot Communications Ltd reported a net income of 1.94M and revenue of 26.43M, resulting in a net margin of 7.4%.

ATEN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, A10 Networks, Inc. reported a net income of 12.03M and revenue of 75.00M, resulting in a net margin of 16.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ALLT and ATEN have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ALLT has higher volatility (15.26%) compared to ATEN (10.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALLT dropped -95.42% vs ATEN's -78.29%.

ATEN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.85 vs -0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ALLT and ATEN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer