PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ATEN vs. HAS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ATEN vs. HAS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in A10 Networks, Inc. (ATEN) and Hasbro, Inc. (HAS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ATEN achieves a 78.64% return, which is significantly higher than HAS's 4.15% return. Over the past 10 years, ATEN has outperformed HAS with an annualized return of 17.58%, while HAS has yielded a comparatively lower 3.22% annualized return.


ATEN

1D
-3.68%
1M
16.52%
YTD
78.64%
6M
79.14%
1Y
78.86%
3Y*
30.27%
5Y*
27.49%
10Y*
17.58%

HAS

1D
0.30%
1M
-9.74%
YTD
4.15%
6M
3.56%
1Y
32.40%
3Y*
16.79%
5Y*
1.54%
10Y*
3.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ATEN vs. HAS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ATEN
A10 Networks, Inc.
78.64%-2.59%42.08%-19.43%1.70%68.66%43.52%10.10%-19.17%-7.10%
HAS
Hasbro, Inc.
4.15%52.52%14.76%-11.95%-37.93%11.90%-8.42%33.41%-8.20%19.58%

Correlation

The correlation between ATEN and HAS is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2014

0.25

The correlation between ATEN and HAS shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (1 year) to 0.28 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

ATEN:

$0.61

HAS:

-$2.09

PS Ratio

ATEN:

7.66

HAS:

1.86

Total Revenue (TTM)

ATEN:

$299.42M

HAS:

$4.81B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ATEN:

$237.54M

HAS:

$3.43B

EBITDA (TTM)

ATEN:

$67.78M

HAS:

$283.20M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ATEN vs. HAS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ATEN
ATEN Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
ATEN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATEN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATEN Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
ATEN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATEN Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

HAS
HAS Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
HAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
HAS Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
HAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
HAS Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ATEN vs. HAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for A10 Networks, Inc. (ATEN) and Hasbro, Inc. (HAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ATENHASDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.47

1.13

+1.34

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.12

1.73

+1.40

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.22

+0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.59

1.66

+2.94

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.72

4.45

+4.28

ATEN vs. HAS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ATEN Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is higher than the HAS Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ATEN and HAS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ATENHASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.47

1.13

+1.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.05

+0.61

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

0.10

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.13

0.30

-0.17

Drawdowns

ATEN vs. HAS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATEN drawdown since its inception was -78.29%, which is greater than HAS's maximum drawdown of -74.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATEN and HAS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ATENHASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.29%

-74.17%

-4.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.26%

-19.62%

+2.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.14%

-40.27%

+8.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.87%

-55.05%

+11.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-67.32%

-63.84%

-3.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.68%

-19.38%

+15.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.27%

-24.43%

-15.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.07%

7.30%

+1.77%

Volatility

ATEN vs. HAS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for A10 Networks, Inc. (ATEN) is 9.20%, while Hasbro, Inc. (HAS) has a volatility of 11.67%. This indicates that ATEN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ATENHASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.20%

11.67%

-2.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.65%

23.53%

+1.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.10%

28.82%

+3.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.35%

32.88%

+9.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.10%

33.90%

+9.20%

Dividends

ATEN vs. HAS - Dividend Comparison

ATEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, less than HAS's 3.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ATEN
A10 Networks, Inc.
0.76%1.36%1.30%1.82%1.26%0.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HAS
Hasbro, Inc.
3.33%3.41%5.01%5.48%4.56%2.67%2.91%2.53%3.03%2.44%2.56%2.69%

Financials

ATEN vs. HAS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between A10 Networks, Inc. and Hasbro, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B20222023202420252026
75.00M
1.00B
(ATEN) Total Revenue
(HAS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ATEN vs. HAS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between A10 Networks, Inc. and Hasbro, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
79.6%
74.9%
Portfolio components
ATEN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, A10 Networks, Inc. reported a gross profit of 59.72M and revenue of 75.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.6%.

HAS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hasbro, Inc. reported a gross profit of 749.50M and revenue of 1.00B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.9%.

ATEN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, A10 Networks, Inc. reported an operating income of 13.00M and revenue of 75.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.3%.

HAS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hasbro, Inc. reported an operating income of 270.30M and revenue of 1.00B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.0%.

ATEN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, A10 Networks, Inc. reported a net income of 12.03M and revenue of 75.00M, resulting in a net margin of 16.0%.

HAS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hasbro, Inc. reported a net income of 198.40M and revenue of 1.00B, resulting in a net margin of 19.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ATEN and HAS have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HAS has higher volatility (11.67%) compared to ATEN (9.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ATEN dropped -78.29% vs HAS's -74.17%.

ATEN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ATEN and HAS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer