ATEN vs. HAS

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about A10 Networks, Inc. (ATEN) and Hasbro, Inc. (HAS).

Performance

ATEN vs. HAS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in A10 Networks, Inc. (ATEN) and Hasbro, Inc. (HAS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ATEN vs. HAS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ATEN A10 Networks, Inc.	31.08%	-2.59%	42.08%	-19.43%	1.70%	68.66%	43.52%	10.10%	-19.17%	-7.10%
HAS Hasbro, Inc.	14.93%	52.52%	14.76%	-11.95%	-37.93%	11.90%	-8.42%	33.41%	-8.20%	19.58%

Fundamentals

Market Cap ATEN : $1.68B HAS : $13.35B
EPS ATEN : $0.58 HAS : -$2.28
PS Ratio ATEN : 5.80 HAS : 2.82
PB Ratio ATEN : 7.94 HAS : 23.60
Total Revenue (TTM) ATEN : $290.56M HAS : $4.70B
Gross Profit (TTM) ATEN : $230.52M HAS : $3.34B
EBITDA (TTM) ATEN : $63.70M HAS : $175.70M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ATEN achieves a 31.08% return, which is significantly higher than HAS's 14.93% return. Over the past 10 years, ATEN has outperformed HAS with an annualized return of 14.96%, while HAS has yielded a comparatively lower 5.14% annualized return.

ATEN

• 1D: 3.40%
• 1M: 20.04%
• YTD: 31.08%
• 6M: 28.20%
• 1Y: 43.38%
• 3Y*: 16.05%
• 5Y*: 20.47%
• 10Y*: 14.96%

HAS

• 1D: 4.71%
• 1M: -6.01%
• YTD: 14.93%
• 6M: 25.41%
• 1Y: 57.67%
• 3Y*: 25.76%
• 5Y*: 3.66%
• 10Y*: 5.14%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

ATEN vs. HAS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ATEN

ATEN Risk / Return Rank: 78
ATEN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
ATEN Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
ATEN Omega Ratio Rank: 75
ATEN Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
ATEN Martin Ratio Rank: 75

HAS

HAS Risk / Return Rank: 87
HAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
HAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
HAS Omega Ratio Rank: 87
HAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
HAS Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ATEN vs. HAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for A10 Networks, Inc. (ATEN) and Hasbro, Inc. (HAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ATEN	HAS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.35	1.69	-0.33
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.98	2.42	-0.44
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.35	-0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.32	3.14	-0.83
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.33	9.43	-5.11
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ATEN vs. HAS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ATEN Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is comparable to the HAS Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ATEN and HAS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ATEN	HAS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.35	1.69	-0.33
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.49	0.11	+0.37
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.35	0.15	+0.19
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.08	0.31	-0.23

Correlation

The correlation between ATEN and HAS is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

ATEN vs. HAS - Dividend Comparison

ATEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, less than HAS's 2.99% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ATEN A10 Networks, Inc.	1.04%	1.36%	1.30%	1.82%	1.26%	0.30%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
HAS Hasbro, Inc.	2.99%	3.41%	5.01%	5.48%	4.56%	2.67%	2.91%	2.53%	3.03%	2.44%	2.56%	2.69%

Drawdowns

ATEN vs. HAS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATEN drawdown since its inception was -78.29%, which is greater than HAS's maximum drawdown of -74.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATEN and HAS.

Drawdown Indicators

	ATEN	HAS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-78.29%	-74.17%	-4.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.26%	-19.11%	+1.85%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.87%	-55.05%	+11.18%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-67.32%	-63.84%	-3.48%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.60%	-11.04%	+10.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-40.84%	-24.48%	-16.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.24%	6.36%	+2.88%

Volatility

ATEN vs. HAS - Volatility Comparison

A10 Networks, Inc. (ATEN) has a higher volatility of 9.39% compared to Hasbro, Inc. (HAS) at 7.40%. This indicates that ATEN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ATEN	HAS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.39%	7.40%	+1.99%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.77%	19.11%	+3.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.28%	34.36%	-2.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	42.24%	32.19%	+10.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	43.12%	33.61%	+9.51%

Financials

ATEN vs. HAS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between A10 Networks, Inc. and Hasbro, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

ATEN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, A10 Networks, Inc. reported a gross profit of 63.26M and revenue of 80.36M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 78.7%.

HAS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Hasbro, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.03B and revenue of 1.45B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.4%.

ATEN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, A10 Networks, Inc. reported an operating income of 15.06M and revenue of 80.36M, resulting in an operating margin of 18.7%.

HAS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Hasbro, Inc. reported an operating income of 297.50M and revenue of 1.45B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.6%.

ATEN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, A10 Networks, Inc. reported a net income of 9.87M and revenue of 80.36M, resulting in a net margin of 12.3%.

HAS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Hasbro, Inc. reported a net income of 201.60M and revenue of 1.45B, resulting in a net margin of 13.9%.