PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ATEN vs. MERC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ATEN vs. MERC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in A10 Networks, Inc. (ATEN) and Mercer International Inc. (MERC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ATEN achieves a 91.87% return, which is significantly higher than MERC's -56.62% return. Over the past 10 years, ATEN has outperformed MERC with an annualized return of 19.03%, while MERC has yielded a comparatively lower -17.35% annualized return.


ATEN

1D
1.53%
1M
15.81%
YTD
91.87%
6M
87.22%
1Y
92.22%
3Y*
34.44%
5Y*
27.05%
10Y*
19.03%

MERC

1D
-2.78%
1M
-17.40%
YTD
-56.62%
6M
-58.70%
1Y
-74.55%
3Y*
-53.05%
5Y*
-39.55%
10Y*
-17.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ATEN vs. MERC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ATEN
A10 Networks, Inc.
91.87%-2.59%42.08%-19.43%1.70%68.66%43.52%10.10%-19.17%-7.10%
MERC
Mercer International Inc.
-56.62%-68.51%-28.65%-15.71%-0.59%19.46%-12.81%22.62%-24.32%39.65%

Correlation

The correlation between ATEN and MERC is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2014

0.22

The correlation between ATEN and MERC shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (1 year) to 0.23 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

ATEN:

$0.61

MERC:

-$10.51

PS Ratio

ATEN:

8.23

MERC:

0.02

Total Revenue (TTM)

ATEN:

$299.42M

MERC:

$1.85B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ATEN:

$237.54M

MERC:

-$64.63M

EBITDA (TTM)

ATEN:

$67.78M

MERC:

-$73.03M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ATEN vs. MERC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ATEN
ATEN Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
ATEN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATEN Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATEN Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
ATEN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATEN Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

MERC
MERC Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
MERC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MERC Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
MERC Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
MERC Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
MERC Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ATEN vs. MERC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for A10 Networks, Inc. (ATEN) and Mercer International Inc. (MERC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ATENMERCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+5.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

0.78

+0.65

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.37

-0.91

+6.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.19

-1.38

+11.56

ATEN vs. MERC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ATEN Sharpe Ratio is 2.85, which is higher than the MERC Sharpe Ratio of -1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ATEN and MERC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ATEN vs. MERC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATEN drawdown since its inception was -78.29%, smaller than the maximum MERC drawdown of -99.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATEN and MERC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ATENMERCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.29%

-99.05%

+20.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.26%

-81.74%

+64.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.14%

-92.20%

+60.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.87%

-94.81%

+50.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-67.32%

-94.81%

+27.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-95.56%

+95.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.11%

-61.19%

+21.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.09%

54.02%

-44.93%

Volatility

ATEN vs. MERC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for A10 Networks, Inc. (ATEN) is 10.72%, while Mercer International Inc. (MERC) has a volatility of 22.13%. This indicates that ATEN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MERC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ATENMERCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.72%

22.13%

-11.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.27%

55.37%

-30.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.55%

74.94%

-42.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.36%

52.40%

-10.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.14%

48.29%

-5.15%

Dividends

ATEN vs. MERC - Dividend Comparison

ATEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%, less than MERC's 8.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ATEN
A10 Networks, Inc.
0.71%1.36%1.30%1.82%1.26%0.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MERC
Mercer International Inc.
8.73%7.58%4.62%3.16%2.58%2.17%3.24%4.37%4.79%3.29%4.32%2.54%

Financials

ATEN vs. MERC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between A10 Networks, Inc. and Mercer International Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M600.00M20222023202420252026
75.00M
489.30M
(ATEN) Total Revenue
(MERC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ATEN vs. MERC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between A10 Networks, Inc. and Mercer International Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
79.6%
0
Portfolio components
ATEN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, A10 Networks, Inc. reported a gross profit of 59.72M and revenue of 75.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.6%.

MERC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mercer International Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 489.30M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

ATEN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, A10 Networks, Inc. reported an operating income of 13.00M and revenue of 75.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.3%.

MERC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mercer International Inc. reported an operating income of -32.89M and revenue of 489.30M, resulting in an operating margin of -6.7%.

ATEN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, A10 Networks, Inc. reported a net income of 12.03M and revenue of 75.00M, resulting in a net margin of 16.0%.

MERC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mercer International Inc. reported a net income of -52.00M and revenue of 489.30M, resulting in a net margin of -10.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ATEN and MERC have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MERC has higher volatility (22.13%) compared to ATEN (10.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ATEN dropped -78.29% vs MERC's -99.05%.

ATEN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.85 vs -1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ATEN and MERC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer