ALLT vs. RDWR

In the year-to-date period, ALLT achieves a 44.20% return, which is significantly higher than RDWR's -1.86% return. Over the past 10 years, ALLT has underperformed RDWR with an annualized return of -0.49%, while RDWR has yielded a comparatively higher 1.40% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allot Communications Ltd (ALLT) and Radware Ltd. (RDWR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current ALLT Sharpe Ratio is 6.60, which is higher than the RDWR Sharpe Ratio of 0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALLT and RDWR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither ALLT nor RDWR has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum ALLT drawdown since its inception was -95.42%, roughly equal to the maximum RDWR drawdown of -93.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALLT and RDWR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Allot Communications Ltd (ALLT) has a higher volatility of 24.61% compared to Radware Ltd. (RDWR) at 7.54%. This indicates that ALLT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RDWR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Allot Communications Ltd and Radware Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.