ALLT vs. CYBR
Compare and contrast key facts about Allot Communications Ltd (ALLT) and CyberArk Software Ltd. (CYBR).
Performance
ALLT vs. CYBR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ALLT vs. CYBR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALLT Allot Communications Ltd | -29.60% | 65.21% | 260.61% | -52.03% | -71.04% | 12.93% | 23.76% | 40.03% | 13.88% | 11.27% |
CYBR CyberArk Software Ltd. | -8.34% | 33.89% | 52.09% | 68.95% | -25.18% | 7.23% | 38.61% | 57.24% | 79.13% | -9.03% |
Fundamentals
ALLT:
$344.99M
CYBR:
$20.69B
ALLT:
$0.08
CYBR:
-$2.92
ALLT:
3.01
CYBR:
15.13
ALLT:
3.04
CYBR:
8.61
ALLT:
$101.99M
CYBR:
$1.36B
ALLT:
$71.72M
CYBR:
$1.01B
ALLT:
$8.49M
CYBR:
$59.13M
Returns By Period
ALLT
- 1D
- 3.90%
- 1M
- 1.32%
- YTD
- -29.60%
- 6M
- -34.03%
- 1Y
- 25.14%
- 3Y*
- 37.02%
- 5Y*
- -16.03%
- 10Y*
- 3.08%
CYBR
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ALLT vs. CYBR — Risk / Return Rank
ALLT
CYBR
ALLT vs. CYBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allot Communications Ltd (ALLT) and CyberArk Software Ltd. (CYBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ALLT | CYBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.35 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.98 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.46 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.10 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ALLT | CYBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.27 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.06 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.07 | — | — |
Correlation
The correlation between ALLT and CYBR is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
ALLT vs. CYBR - Dividend Comparison
Neither ALLT nor CYBR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
ALLT vs. CYBR - Drawdown Comparison
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ALLT | CYBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.42% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -45.65% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -93.72% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -93.72% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -75.31% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -64.60% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.32% | — | — |
Volatility
ALLT vs. CYBR - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ALLT | CYBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.30% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 51.89% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 72.34% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 60.41% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.98% | — | — |
Financials
ALLT vs. CYBR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Allot Communications Ltd and CyberArk Software Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ALLT vs. CYBR - Profitability Comparison
ALLT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Allot Communications Ltd reported a gross profit of 20.31M and revenue of 28.39M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.5%.
CYBR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CyberArk Software Ltd. reported a gross profit of 267.25M and revenue of 372.65M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.7%.
ALLT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Allot Communications Ltd reported an operating income of 2.57M and revenue of 28.39M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.1%.
CYBR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CyberArk Software Ltd. reported an operating income of 1.75M and revenue of 372.65M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.5%.
ALLT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Allot Communications Ltd reported a net income of 2.90M and revenue of 28.39M, resulting in a net margin of 10.2%.
CYBR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CyberArk Software Ltd. reported a net income of -17.11M and revenue of 372.65M, resulting in a net margin of -4.6%.