PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
ATEN vs. ARKF
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between ATEN and ARKF is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.4

Performance

ATEN vs. ARKF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in A10 Networks, Inc. (ATEN) and ARK Fintech Innovation ETF (ARKF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
50.23%
35.74%
ATEN
ARKF

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ATEN:

1.65

ARKF:

1.37

Sortino Ratio

ATEN:

2.46

ARKF:

1.91

Omega Ratio

ATEN:

1.33

ARKF:

1.24

Calmar Ratio

ATEN:

1.62

ARKF:

0.65

Martin Ratio

ATEN:

4.85

ARKF:

5.52

Ulcer Index

ATEN:

11.45%

ARKF:

7.30%

Daily Std Dev

ATEN:

33.78%

ARKF:

29.43%

Max Drawdown

ATEN:

-78.28%

ARKF:

-78.63%

Current Drawdown

ATEN:

-7.07%

ARKF:

-40.35%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ATEN achieves a 9.65% return, which is significantly higher than ARKF's 2.40% return.


ATEN

YTD

9.65%

1M

4.70%

6M

49.33%

1Y

51.84%

5Y*

26.55%

10Y*

17.28%

ARKF

YTD

2.40%

1M

-7.44%

6M

32.38%

1Y

35.50%

5Y*

9.34%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

ATEN vs. ARKF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ATEN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ATEN is 8787
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ATEN is 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ATEN is 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ATEN is 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ATEN is 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ATEN is 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

ARKF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ARKF is 5454
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ARKF is 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ARKF is 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ARKF is 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ARKF is 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ARKF is 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ATEN vs. ARKF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for A10 Networks, Inc. (ATEN) and ARK Fintech Innovation ETF (ARKF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ATEN, currently valued at 1.65, compared to the broader market-3.00-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.001.651.37
The chart of Sortino ratio for ATEN, currently valued at 2.46, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.461.91
The chart of Omega ratio for ATEN, currently valued at 1.33, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.331.24
The chart of Calmar ratio for ATEN, currently valued at 1.62, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.620.65
The chart of Martin ratio for ATEN, currently valued at 4.85, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.004.855.52
ATEN
ARKF

The current ATEN Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is comparable to the ARKF Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ATEN and ARKF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.503.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
1.65
1.37
ATEN
ARKF

Dividends

ATEN vs. ARKF - Dividend Comparison

ATEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, while ARKF has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202420232022202120202019
ATEN
A10 Networks, Inc.
1.19%1.30%1.82%1.26%0.30%0.00%0.00%
ARKF
ARK Fintech Innovation ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.37%1.25%

Drawdowns

ATEN vs. ARKF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATEN drawdown since its inception was -78.28%, roughly equal to the maximum ARKF drawdown of -78.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATEN and ARKF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-7.07%
-40.35%
ATEN
ARKF

Volatility

ATEN vs. ARKF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for A10 Networks, Inc. (ATEN) is 9.41%, while ARK Fintech Innovation ETF (ARKF) has a volatility of 10.21%. This indicates that ATEN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARKF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%10.00%11.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
9.41%
10.21%
ATEN
ARKF
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab