ATEN vs. ARKF

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

ATEN (A10 Networks, Inc.) is a stock, while ARKF (ARK Fintech Innovation ETF) is Blockchain fund actively managed by ARK. Over the past 5 years, ATEN returned 19.93%/yr vs -4.77%/yr for ARKF. Their 0.45 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.

Performance

ATEN vs. ARKF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in A10 Networks, Inc. (ATEN) and ARK Fintech Innovation ETF (ARKF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ATEN achieves a 68.01% return, which is significantly higher than ARKF's -16.75% return.

ATEN

• 1D: -1.27%
• 1M: -18.54%
• 6M: 70.42%
• YTD: 68.01%
• 1Y: 68.60%
• 3Y*: 24.97%
• 5Y*: 19.93%
• 10Y*: 14.84%
• ALL TIME*: 6.99%

ARKF

• 1D: -2.10%
• 1M: -3.22%
• 6M: -8.41%
• YTD: -16.75%
• 1Y: -22.13%
• 3Y*: 18.55%
• 5Y*: -4.77%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 9.71%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ARKF ARK Fintech Innovation ETF	$6.49M	$5.67M	$7.32M
ATEN A10 Networks, Inc.	$45.04M	$43.58M	$38.84M

ATEN vs. ARKF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
ATEN A10 Networks, Inc.	68.01%	-2.59%	42.08%	-19.43%	1.70%	68.66%	43.52%	-0.29%
ARKF ARK Fintech Innovation ETF	-16.75%	28.67%	34.34%	93.27%	-65.07%	-17.82%	108.03%	20.45%

Correlation

The correlation between ATEN and ARKF is 0.39, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.39
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.44
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.46
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2019	0.45

Return for Risk

ATEN vs. ARKF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ATEN

ATEN Risk / Return Rank: 87
ATEN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
ATEN Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
ATEN Omega Ratio Rank: 84
ATEN Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
ATEN Martin Ratio Rank: 93

ARKF

ARKF Risk / Return Rank: 4
ARKF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
ARKF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
ARKF Omega Ratio Rank: 4
ARKF Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
ARKF Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ATEN vs. ARKF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for A10 Networks, Inc. (ATEN) and ARK Fintech Innovation ETF (ARKF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ATEN	ARKF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.80	-0.77	+2.57
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.33	-0.96	+3.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	0.89	+0.41
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.56	-0.68	+3.24
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.45	-1.10	+12.54

ATEN vs. ARKF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ATEN Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is higher than the ARKF Sharpe Ratio of -0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ATEN and ARKF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ATEN vs. ARKF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATEN drawdown since its inception was -78.29%, roughly equal to the maximum ARKF drawdown of -78.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATEN and ARKF.

Drawdown Indicators

	ATEN	ARKF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-78.29%	-78.63%	+0.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.48%	-38.50%	+14.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-32.10%	-38.50%	+6.40%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.87%	-75.30%	+31.43%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-67.32%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-22.41%	-37.60%	+15.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-39.80%	-34.98%	-4.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.48%	23.82%	-18.34%

Volatility

ATEN vs. ARKF - Volatility Comparison

A10 Networks, Inc. (ATEN) has a higher volatility of 13.85% compared to ARK Fintech Innovation ETF (ARKF) at 8.29%. This indicates that ATEN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARKF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ATEN	ARKF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.85%	8.29%	+5.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	28.85%	26.23%	+2.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.95%	34.01%	+0.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	42.28%	42.99%	-0.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	43.27%	39.63%	+3.64%

Dividends

ATEN vs. ARKF - Dividend Comparison

ATEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, more than ARKF's 0.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
ARKF ARK Fintech Innovation ETF	0.11%	0.09%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.37%	1.25%
ATEN A10 Networks, Inc.	0.81%	1.36%	1.30%	1.82%	1.26%	0.30%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ATEN and ARKF in my portfolio?

ATEN and ARKF have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ATEN or ARKF?

ATEN has higher volatility (13.85%) compared to ARKF (8.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ATEN dropped -78.29% vs ARKF's -78.63%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ATEN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs -0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.