PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ALLT vs. CGNT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ALLT vs. CGNT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allot Communications Ltd (ALLT) and Cognyte Software Ltd. (CGNT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALLT achieves a -24.42% return, which is significantly lower than CGNT's -13.19% return.


ALLT

1D
5.99%
1M
-3.51%
YTD
-24.42%
6M
-19.85%
1Y
-20.62%
3Y*
32.76%
5Y*
-17.09%
10Y*
4.31%

CGNT

1D
0.37%
1M
-19.21%
YTD
-13.19%
6M
-14.47%
1Y
-11.01%
3Y*
12.31%
5Y*
-18.91%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ALLT vs. CGNT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ALLT
Allot Communications Ltd
-24.42%65.21%260.61%-52.03%-71.04%-8.05%
CGNT
Cognyte Software Ltd.
-13.19%8.67%34.53%106.75%-80.15%-53.15%

Correlation

The correlation between ALLT and CGNT is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2021

0.24

The correlation between ALLT and CGNT shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (5 years) to 0.41 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ALLT:

$370.71M

CGNT:

$596.19M

EPS

ALLT:

$0.13

CGNT:

-$0.04

PS Ratio

ALLT:

3.23

CGNT:

1.47

PB Ratio

ALLT:

3.21

CGNT:

3.05

Total Revenue (TTM)

ALLT:

$105.27M

CGNT:

$409.99M

Gross Profit (TTM)

ALLT:

$74.41M

CGNT:

$297.63M

EBITDA (TTM)

ALLT:

$10.81M

CGNT:

$23.41M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ALLT vs. CGNT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALLT
ALLT Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
ALLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALLT Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
ALLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALLT Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

CGNT
CGNT Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
CGNT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGNT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGNT Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
CGNT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGNT Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALLT vs. CGNT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allot Communications Ltd (ALLT) and Cognyte Software Ltd. (CGNT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ALLTCGNTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.01

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.45

-0.31

-0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.81

-0.80

-0.01

ALLT vs. CGNT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALLT Sharpe Ratio is -0.32, which is lower than the CGNT Sharpe Ratio of -0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALLT and CGNT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ALLT vs. CGNT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALLT drawdown since its inception was -95.42%, roughly equal to the maximum CGNT drawdown of -92.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALLT and CGNT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ALLTCGNTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.42%

-92.97%

-2.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-45.65%

-35.76%

-9.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-59.72%

-44.34%

-15.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-93.58%

-91.66%

-1.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-93.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-73.49%

-75.61%

+2.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-65.06%

-69.81%

+4.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.49%

13.72%

+11.77%

Volatility

ALLT vs. CGNT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Allot Communications Ltd (ALLT) is 16.25%, while Cognyte Software Ltd. (CGNT) has a volatility of 27.47%. This indicates that ALLT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CGNT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ALLTCGNTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.25%

27.47%

-11.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

52.31%

44.57%

+7.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

65.61%

50.92%

+14.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

60.76%

57.80%

+2.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.34%

57.66%

-5.32%

Dividends

ALLT vs. CGNT - Dividend Comparison

Neither ALLT nor CGNT has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

ALLT vs. CGNT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Allot Communications Ltd and Cognyte Software Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


20.00M40.00M60.00M80.00M100.00M120.00M20222023202420252026
26.43M
105.49M
(ALLT) Total Revenue
(CGNT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ALLT vs. CGNT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Allot Communications Ltd and Cognyte Software Ltd. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

50.0%55.0%60.0%65.0%70.0%75.0%20222023202420252026
70.9%
72.2%
Portfolio components
ALLT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Allot Communications Ltd reported a gross profit of 18.74M and revenue of 26.43M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 70.9%.

CGNT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cognyte Software Ltd. reported a gross profit of 76.12M and revenue of 105.49M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 72.2%.

ALLT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Allot Communications Ltd reported an operating income of 1.53M and revenue of 26.43M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.8%.

CGNT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cognyte Software Ltd. reported an operating income of 4.41M and revenue of 105.49M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.2%.

ALLT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Allot Communications Ltd reported a net income of 1.94M and revenue of 26.43M, resulting in a net margin of 7.4%.

CGNT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cognyte Software Ltd. reported a net income of -3.04M and revenue of 105.49M, resulting in a net margin of -2.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ALLT and CGNT have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CGNT has higher volatility (27.47%) compared to ALLT (16.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALLT dropped -95.42% vs CGNT's -92.97%.

CGNT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.22 vs -0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ALLT and CGNT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer