ALB vs. ARRNF
ALB (Albemarle Corporation) and ARRNF (American Rare Earths Limited) are both stocks. Both are in the Basic Materials sector — ALB in Specialty Chemicals, ARRNF in Other Industrial Metals & Mining. Over the past 5 years, ALB returned -8.17%/yr vs 66.45%/yr for ARRNF. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ALB vs. ARRNF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ALB achieves a -15.71% return, which is significantly lower than ARRNF's 21.67% return.
ALB
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- -26.02%
- 6M
- -30.90%
- YTD
- -15.71%
- 1Y
- 55.83%
- 3Y*
- -16.84%
- 5Y*
- -8.17%
- 10Y*
- 4.78%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.67%
ARRNF
- 1D
- 1.39%
- 1M
- -5.37%
- 6M
- -8.75%
- YTD
- 21.67%
- 1Y
- 2.20%
- 3Y*
- 28.65%
- 5Y*
- 66.45%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 47.35%
ALB vs. ARRNF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALB Albemarle Corporation | -15.71% | 67.72% | -39.50% | -32.80% | -6.63% | 59.76% | 70.34% |
ARRNF American Rare Earths Limited | 21.67% | 23.89% | 41.25% | -11.60% | 4.42% | 550.00% | -20.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between ALB and ARRNF is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 22, 2020 | 0.11 |
Fundamentals
ALB:
$13.99B
ARRNF:
$148.47M
ALB:
-$2.33
ARRNF:
-A$0.02
ALB:
1.85
ARRNF:
4.22
ALB:
$5.49B
ARRNF:
-A$128.85K
ALB:
$1.02B
ARRNF:
-A$385.87K
ALB:
$801.97M
ARRNF:
-A$12.72M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ALB vs. ARRNF — Risk / Return Rank
ALB
ARRNF
ALB vs. ARRNF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Albemarle Corporation (ALB) and American Rare Earths Limited (ARRNF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ALB | ARRNF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.13 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.25 | 0.03 | +1.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.59 | 0.04 | +3.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ALB vs. ARRNF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ALB drawdown since its inception was -83.90%, roughly equal to the maximum ARRNF drawdown of -83.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALB and ARRNF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ALB | ARRNF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.90% | -83.01% | -0.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -45.04% | -69.13% | +24.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -75.88% | -69.13% | -6.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -83.90% | -83.01% | -0.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -83.90% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -61.63% | -62.44% | +0.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.79% | -46.53% | +25.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.60% | 53.37% | -37.77% |
Volatility
ALB vs. ARRNF - Volatility Comparison
Albemarle Corporation (ALB) and American Rare Earths Limited (ARRNF) have volatilities of 11.19% and 10.70%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ALB | ARRNF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.19% | 10.70% | +0.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.03% | 42.57% | -0.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 61.54% | 119.70% | -58.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 54.74% | 314.83% | -260.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.43% | 287.41% | -238.98% |
Dividends
ALB vs. ARRNF - Dividend Comparison
ALB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, while ARRNF has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALB Albemarle Corporation | 1.37% | 1.15% | 1.87% | 1.11% | 0.73% | 0.67% | 1.04% | 2.01% | 1.74% | 1.00% | 1.42% | 2.07% |
ARRNF American Rare Earths Limited | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
ALB vs. ARRNF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Albemarle Corporation and American Rare Earths Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
ALB and ARRNF have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ALB has higher volatility (11.19%) compared to ARRNF (10.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALB dropped -83.90% vs ARRNF's -83.01%.
ALB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.91 vs 0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ALB and ARRNF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer