ARRNF vs. LYSDY

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

ARRNF (American Rare Earths Limited) and LYSDY (Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR) are both stocks. Both operate in the Other Industrial Metals & Mining industry within the Basic Materials sector. Over the past 5 years, ARRNF returned 71.30%/yr vs 25.86%/yr for LYSDY. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

ARRNF vs. LYSDY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Rare Earths Limited (ARRNF) and Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR (LYSDY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARRNF achieves a 40.48% return, which is significantly lower than LYSDY's 61.19% return.

ARRNF

• 1D: 1.06%
• 1M: 11.03%
• YTD: 40.48%
• 6M: 10.53%
• 1Y: 57.00%
• 3Y*: 38.79%
• 5Y*: 71.30%
• 10Y*: —

LYSDY

• 1D: -2.77%
• 1M: -0.82%
• YTD: 61.19%
• 6M: 39.29%
• 1Y: 143.25%
• 3Y*: 37.23%
• 5Y*: 25.86%
• 10Y*: 77.07%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARRNF vs. LYSDY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ARRNF American Rare Earths Limited	40.48%	23.89%	41.25%	-11.60%	4.42%	550.00%	-20.00%
LYSDY Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR	61.19%	109.37%	-18.22%	-8.17%	-29.21%	144.41%	98.69%

Correlation

The correlation between ARRNF and LYSDY is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.30
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.18
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.16
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2020	0.14

The correlation between ARRNF and LYSDY shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (all time) to 0.30 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap ARRNF : $164.41M LYSDY : $13.10B
EPS ARRNF : -$0.02 LYSDY : $0.14
PB Ratio ARRNF : 3.41 LYSDY : 3.90
Total Revenue (TTM) ARRNF : -$128.85K LYSDY : $1.19B
Gross Profit (TTM) ARRNF : -$385.87K LYSDY : $301.27M
EBITDA (TTM) ARRNF : -$12.72M LYSDY : $236.57M

Return for Risk

ARRNF vs. LYSDY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARRNF

ARRNF Risk / Return Rank: 63
ARRNF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
ARRNF Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
ARRNF Omega Ratio Rank: 71
ARRNF Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
ARRNF Martin Ratio Rank: 54

LYSDY

LYSDY Risk / Return Rank: 84
LYSDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
LYSDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
LYSDY Omega Ratio Rank: 82
LYSDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
LYSDY Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARRNF vs. LYSDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Rare Earths Limited (ARRNF) and Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR (LYSDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ARRNF	LYSDY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.45	2.20	-1.74
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.91	2.54	-0.63
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.32	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.83	3.11	-2.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.17	6.54	-5.37
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ARRNF vs. LYSDY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARRNF Sharpe Ratio is 0.45, which is lower than the LYSDY Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARRNF and LYSDY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ARRNF	LYSDY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.45	2.20	-1.74
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.23	0.51	-0.29
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.28	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.18	0.03	+0.15

Drawdowns

ARRNF vs. LYSDY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARRNF drawdown since its inception was -83.01%, smaller than the maximum LYSDY drawdown of -99.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARRNF and LYSDY.

Drawdown Indicators

	ARRNF	LYSDY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-83.01%	-99.93%	+16.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-69.13%	-46.39%	-22.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-69.13%	-46.39%	-22.74%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-83.01%	-58.25%	-24.76%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-72.35%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-56.64%	-51.79%	-4.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-46.25%	-84.54%	+38.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	49.07%	21.99%	+27.08%

Volatility

ARRNF vs. LYSDY - Volatility Comparison

American Rare Earths Limited (ARRNF) has a higher volatility of 23.11% compared to Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR (LYSDY) at 15.56%. This indicates that ARRNF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LYSDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ARRNF	LYSDY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	23.11%	15.56%	+7.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	49.48%	43.01%	+6.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	126.38%	65.71%	+60.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	314.60%	50.50%	+264.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	290.42%	278.58%	+11.84%

Dividends

ARRNF vs. LYSDY - Dividend Comparison

Neither ARRNF nor LYSDY has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ARRNF and LYSDY in my portfolio?

ARRNF and LYSDY have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ARRNF or LYSDY?

ARRNF has higher volatility (23.11%) compared to LYSDY (15.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARRNF dropped -83.01% vs LYSDY's -99.93%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LYSDY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.