ALB vs. AREC
ALB (Albemarle Corporation) and AREC (American Resources Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Basic Materials sector — ALB in Specialty Chemicals, AREC in Coking Coal. Over the past 5 years, ALB returned -1.83%/yr vs -5.50%/yr for AREC. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ALB vs. AREC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ALB achieves a 6.20% return, which is significantly higher than AREC's -13.10% return.
ALB
- 1D
- -3.60%
- 1M
- -26.38%
- YTD
- 6.20%
- 6M
- 18.45%
- 1Y
- 154.84%
- 3Y*
- -10.75%
- 5Y*
- -1.83%
- 10Y*
- 7.95%
AREC
- 1D
- 2.13%
- 1M
- -3.79%
- YTD
- -13.10%
- 6M
- -23.31%
- 1Y
- 229.01%
- 3Y*
- 7.70%
- 5Y*
- -5.50%
- 10Y*
- —
ALB vs. AREC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALB Albemarle Corporation | 6.20% | 67.72% | -39.50% | -32.80% | -6.63% | 59.76% | 105.39% | -3.28% | -38.89% |
AREC American Resources Corporation | -13.10% | 145.54% | -32.21% | 12.88% | -26.67% | -7.69% | 209.52% | -93.70% | 19,900.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between ALB and AREC is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2018 | 0.23 |
Fundamentals
ALB:
-$2.33
AREC:
-$0.45
ALB:
3.22
AREC:
1.24K
ALB:
$5.49B
AREC:
$145.03K
ALB:
$1.02B
AREC:
$140.16K
ALB:
$801.97M
AREC:
-$22.47M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ALB vs. AREC — Risk / Return Rank
ALB
AREC
ALB vs. AREC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Albemarle Corporation (ALB) and American Resources Corporation (AREC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ALB | AREC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.30 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.11 | 3.22 | +1.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.62 | 4.90 | +10.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ALB | AREC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.52 | 1.68 | +0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 | -0.05 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.08 | +0.21 |
Drawdowns
ALB vs. AREC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ALB drawdown since its inception was -83.90%, smaller than the maximum AREC drawdown of -97.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALB and AREC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ALB | AREC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.90% | -97.12% | +13.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.51% | -71.51% | +41.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -78.60% | -80.42% | +1.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -83.90% | -88.07% | +4.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -83.90% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -51.65% | -84.61% | +32.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.67% | -79.73% | +59.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.95% | 46.93% | -36.98% |
Volatility
ALB vs. AREC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Albemarle Corporation (ALB) is 12.42%, while American Resources Corporation (AREC) has a volatility of 32.21%. This indicates that ALB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AREC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ALB | AREC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.42% | 32.21% | -19.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.59% | 73.68% | -32.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 61.95% | 137.47% | -75.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 54.44% | 107.08% | -52.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.23% | 738.12% | -689.89% |
Dividends
ALB vs. AREC - Dividend Comparison
ALB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, while AREC has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALB Albemarle Corporation | 1.08% | 1.15% | 1.87% | 1.11% | 0.73% | 0.67% | 1.04% | 2.01% | 1.74% | 1.00% | 1.42% | 2.07% |
AREC American Resources Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
ALB vs. AREC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Albemarle Corporation and American Resources Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
ALB and AREC have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AREC has higher volatility (32.21%) compared to ALB (12.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALB dropped -83.90% vs AREC's -97.12%.
ALB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ALB and AREC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer