PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AREC vs. LYSDY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AREC vs. LYSDY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Resources Corporation (AREC) and Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR (LYSDY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AREC achieves a 10.48% return, which is significantly lower than LYSDY's 66.63% return.


AREC

1D
6.20%
1M
20.18%
YTD
10.48%
6M
-4.20%
1Y
271.32%
3Y*
19.15%
5Y*
-0.71%
10Y*

LYSDY

1D
0.88%
1M
-0.49%
YTD
66.63%
6M
37.80%
1Y
158.54%
3Y*
39.01%
5Y*
26.88%
10Y*
77.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AREC vs. LYSDY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
AREC
American Resources Corporation
10.48%145.54%-32.21%12.88%-26.67%-7.69%209.52%-93.70%19,900.00%
LYSDY
Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR
66.63%109.37%-18.22%-8.17%-29.21%144.41%79.88%50.87%489.58%

Correlation

The correlation between AREC and LYSDY is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2018

0.16

The correlation between AREC and LYSDY shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (all time) to 0.35 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

AREC:

-$0.45

LYSDY:

$0.14

PS Ratio

AREC:

1.58K

LYSDY:

11.12

Total Revenue (TTM)

AREC:

$145.03K

LYSDY:

$1.19B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AREC:

$140.16K

LYSDY:

$301.27M

EBITDA (TTM)

AREC:

-$22.47M

LYSDY:

$236.57M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AREC vs. LYSDY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AREC
AREC Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
AREC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AREC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
AREC Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
AREC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
AREC Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

LYSDY
LYSDY Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
LYSDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYSDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYSDY Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
LYSDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYSDY Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AREC vs. LYSDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Resources Corporation (AREC) and Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR (LYSDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ARECLYSDYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.00

2.43

-0.43

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.83

2.69

+0.14

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.34

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.60

3.60

+1.00

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.13

7.61

-0.48

AREC vs. LYSDY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AREC Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is comparable to the LYSDY Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AREC and LYSDY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ARECLYSDYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.00

2.43

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

0.54

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.08

0.03

+0.05

Drawdowns

AREC vs. LYSDY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AREC drawdown since its inception was -97.12%, roughly equal to the maximum LYSDY drawdown of -99.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AREC and LYSDY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ARECLYSDYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.12%

-99.93%

+2.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-71.51%

-46.39%

-25.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-80.42%

-46.39%

-34.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-88.07%

-58.25%

-29.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-80.43%

-50.16%

-30.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-79.73%

-84.55%

+4.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

46.19%

21.96%

+24.23%

Volatility

AREC vs. LYSDY - Volatility Comparison

American Resources Corporation (AREC) has a higher volatility of 27.74% compared to Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR (LYSDY) at 15.80%. This indicates that AREC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LYSDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ARECLYSDYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

27.74%

15.80%

+11.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

72.35%

43.02%

+29.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

137.26%

65.70%

+71.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

107.27%

50.49%

+56.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

738.79%

278.69%

+460.10%

Dividends

AREC vs. LYSDY - Dividend Comparison

Neither AREC nor LYSDY has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

AREC vs. LYSDY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between American Resources Corporation and Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M600.00MAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
50.17K
406.10M
(AREC) Total Revenue
(LYSDY) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


AREC and LYSDY have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AREC has higher volatility (27.74%) compared to LYSDY (15.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AREC dropped -97.12% vs LYSDY's -99.93%.

LYSDY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AREC and LYSDY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer