PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AJG vs. LIF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AJG vs. LIF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (AJG) and Life360, Inc. (LIF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AJG achieves a -14.95% return, which is significantly higher than LIF's -29.45% return.


AJG

1D
-1.00%
1M
9.74%
YTD
-14.95%
6M
-13.82%
1Y
-30.16%
3Y*
2.53%
5Y*
9.77%
10Y*
18.56%

LIF

1D
-0.07%
1M
17.44%
YTD
-29.45%
6M
-33.03%
1Y
-25.93%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AJG vs. LIF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
AJG
Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.
-14.95%-8.03%12.87%
LIF
Life360, Inc.
-29.45%55.42%58.73%

Correlation

The correlation between AJG and LIF is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2024

0.11

Fundamentals

EPS

AJG:

$5.74

LIF:

$1.75

PE Ratio

AJG:

38.12

LIF:

25.86

PS Ratio

AJG:

4.08

LIF:

7.30

Total Revenue (TTM)

AJG:

$13.94B

LIF:

$528.98M

Gross Profit (TTM)

AJG:

$7.63B

LIF:

$407.86M

EBITDA (TTM)

AJG:

$3.66B

LIF:

$26.53M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AJG vs. LIF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AJG
AJG Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
AJG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AJG Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
AJG Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
AJG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
AJG Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

LIF
LIF Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
LIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
LIF Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
LIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
LIF Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AJG vs. LIF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (AJG) and Life360, Inc. (LIF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AJGLIFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.81

0.97

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.76

-0.43

-0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.30

-0.70

-0.60

AJG vs. LIF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AJG Sharpe Ratio is -1.12, which is lower than the LIF Sharpe Ratio of -0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AJG and LIF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AJG vs. LIF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AJG drawdown since its inception was -57.49%, smaller than the maximum LIF drawdown of -65.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AJG and LIF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AJGLIFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.49%

-65.64%

+8.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-40.64%

-65.64%

+25.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-36.46%

-59.19%

+22.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.83%

-21.35%

+8.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.87%

40.82%

-16.95%

Volatility

AJG vs. LIF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (AJG) is 8.37%, while Life360, Inc. (LIF) has a volatility of 16.67%. This indicates that AJG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LIF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AJGLIFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.37%

16.67%

-8.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.48%

52.85%

-30.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.85%

67.08%

-39.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.98%

62.97%

-39.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.08%

62.97%

-39.89%

Dividends

AJG vs. LIF - Dividend Comparison

AJG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, while LIF has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AJG
Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.
1.23%1.00%0.85%0.98%1.08%1.13%1.46%1.81%2.23%2.47%2.93%3.62%
LIF
Life360, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

AJG vs. LIF - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. and Life360, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B20222023202420252026
3.63B
143.12M
(AJG) Total Revenue
(LIF) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AJG vs. LIF - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. and Life360, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%20222023202420252026
39.1%
77.3%
Portfolio components
AJG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. reported a gross profit of 1.42B and revenue of 3.63B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.1%.

LIF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Life360, Inc. reported a gross profit of 110.56M and revenue of 143.12M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 77.3%.

AJG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. reported an operating income of 341.00M and revenue of 3.63B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.4%.

LIF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Life360, Inc. reported an operating income of -8.08M and revenue of 143.12M, resulting in an operating margin of -5.6%.

AJG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. reported a net income of 151.00M and revenue of 3.63B, resulting in a net margin of 4.2%.

LIF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Life360, Inc. reported a net income of 2.78M and revenue of 143.12M, resulting in a net margin of 1.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AJG and LIF have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LIF has higher volatility (16.67%) compared to AJG (8.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AJG dropped -57.49% vs LIF's -65.64%.

LIF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.43 vs -1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AJG and LIF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer