PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AJG vs. AFL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AJG vs. AFL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (AJG) and Aflac Incorporated (AFL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AJG achieves a -17.35% return, which is significantly lower than AFL's 5.61% return. Over the past 10 years, AJG has outperformed AFL with an annualized return of 17.92%, while AFL has yielded a comparatively lower 15.48% annualized return.


AJG

1D
-1.67%
1M
7.22%
YTD
-17.35%
6M
-10.08%
1Y
-34.63%
3Y*
1.87%
5Y*
9.17%
10Y*
17.92%

AFL

1D
-2.54%
1M
2.42%
YTD
5.61%
6M
7.77%
1Y
13.52%
3Y*
21.24%
5Y*
17.94%
10Y*
15.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AJG vs. AFL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AJG
Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.
-17.35%-8.03%27.34%20.51%12.44%39.02%32.12%31.79%19.19%25.04%
AFL
Aflac Incorporated
5.61%8.94%28.08%17.36%26.41%34.55%-13.60%18.55%6.20%29.02%

Correlation

The correlation between AJG and AFL is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 1984

0.32

The correlation between AJG and AFL shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (all time) to 0.54 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

AJG:

$5.74

AFL:

$8.76

PE Ratio

AJG:

37.04

AFL:

13.16

PEG Ratio

AJG:

3.84

AFL:

3.41

PS Ratio

AJG:

3.97

AFL:

3.35

Total Revenue (TTM)

AJG:

$13.94B

AFL:

$18.22B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AJG:

$7.63B

AFL:

$8.70B

EBITDA (TTM)

AJG:

$3.66B

AFL:

$6.67B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AJG vs. AFL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AJG
AJG Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
AJG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AJG Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
AJG Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
AJG Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
AJG Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

AFL
AFL Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
AFL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AFL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
AFL Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
AFL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
AFL Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AJG vs. AFL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (AJG) and Aflac Incorporated (AFL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AJGAFLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.78

1.14

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.85

1.49

-2.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.47

3.70

-5.18

AJG vs. AFL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AJG Sharpe Ratio is -1.25, which is lower than the AFL Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AJG and AFL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AJGAFLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.25

0.80

-2.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

0.86

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

0.60

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.48

-0.01

Drawdowns

AJG vs. AFL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AJG drawdown since its inception was -57.49%, smaller than the maximum AFL drawdown of -82.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AJG and AFL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AJGAFLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.49%

-82.71%

+25.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-40.64%

-9.11%

-31.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.40%

-13.56%

-30.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.40%

-19.86%

-24.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.40%

-54.89%

+10.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-38.26%

-2.54%

-35.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.83%

-11.66%

-1.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.06%

3.67%

+20.39%

Volatility

AJG vs. AFL - Volatility Comparison

Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (AJG) has a higher volatility of 8.97% compared to Aflac Incorporated (AFL) at 5.82%. This indicates that AJG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AFL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AJGAFLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.97%

5.82%

+3.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.42%

12.24%

+10.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.95%

17.08%

+10.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.96%

20.94%

+2.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.08%

25.77%

-2.69%

Dividends

AJG vs. AFL - Dividend Comparison

AJG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, less than AFL's 2.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AFL
Aflac Incorporated
2.07%2.10%1.93%2.04%2.22%2.26%2.52%2.04%2.28%1.98%2.39%2.64%
AJG
Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.
1.27%1.00%0.85%0.98%1.08%1.13%1.46%1.81%2.23%2.47%2.93%3.62%

Financials

AJG vs. AFL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. and Aflac Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20222023202420252026
3.63B
4.32B
(AJG) Total Revenue
(AFL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AJG vs. AFL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. and Aflac Incorporated over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
39.1%
57.5%
Portfolio components
AJG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. reported a gross profit of 1.42B and revenue of 3.63B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.1%.

AFL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aflac Incorporated reported a gross profit of 2.48B and revenue of 4.32B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.5%.

AJG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. reported an operating income of 341.00M and revenue of 3.63B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.4%.

AFL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aflac Incorporated reported an operating income of 1.23B and revenue of 4.32B, resulting in an operating margin of 28.4%.

AJG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. reported a net income of 151.00M and revenue of 3.63B, resulting in a net margin of 4.2%.

AFL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aflac Incorporated reported a net income of 1.02B and revenue of 4.32B, resulting in a net margin of 23.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AJG and AFL have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AJG has higher volatility (8.97%) compared to AFL (5.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AJG dropped -57.49% vs AFL's -82.71%.

AFL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.80 vs -1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AJG and AFL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer